comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: martillo@athena.mit.edu (Yakim Martillo)
Subject: Re: Microsoft OS/2 -- Ideal for Ada
Date: Wed, 17-Jun-87 18:13:55 EDT	[thread overview]
Date: Wed Jun 17 18:13:55 1987
Message-ID: <944@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 459@gumby.UUCP


Just out of curiosity, a lot of the posters have referred to the
tremendous overhead of unix processes.  While I grant that there is
overhead associated with Unix processes, the other two operating
systems I know best and despise a lot more (VMS and Multics) have far
more overhead associated with processes and generally really
discourage the user from spawning a new processes.  In both cases the
command interpreter loads the procedures which the use wants to invoke
and then directly calls the users routines.  Basically there is only
one process, the command interpreter.  If you like this sort of
environment you can always write a unix shell which will work this
way.  Of course pipelining processes becomes impossible.  With VMS and
Multics its fairly hard to disassociate a process from the terminal.
I think it may actually be impossible in the case of Mulics to
disassociate the process completely.  I find this limitation sort of
a pain.

  reply	other threads:[~1987-06-17 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1987-06-13  0:06 Microsoft OS/2 -- Ideal for Ada Herm Fischer
1987-06-15 11:40 ` martillo
1987-06-16 12:50   ` Robert Firth
1987-06-16 22:24     ` martillo
1987-06-17  4:14     ` Mark I. Himelstein
1987-06-17 22:13       ` Yakim Martillo [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1987-06-17 16:28 "VAXR::IVANOVIC"
1987-06-19 11:33 ` martillo
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox