From: mitchell@community-chest.uucp (George Mitchell)
Subject: Re: 10 Commandments for Ada9X
Date: 6 Feb 90 16:32:02 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94347@linus.UUCP> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9002021545.AA03784@ctc.contel.com
In article <9002021545.AA03784@ctc.contel.com> mathis@CTC.CONTEL.COM
(Bob Mathis x4232) wrote:
`1. PUBLIC ....
`2. CONSERVATIVE ....
`9. STRICT CONFORMANCE ....
`10. KEEP IT ADA ....
The Ada9X effort has been underway for some time. Do any of the above
"command" some kind of change to the way they have been working?
`3. ISO ....
`4. OOP ....
`5. REAL-TIME ....
`6. RELIABLE ....
`7. INTERFACES ....
`8. SIMPLIFY/UNIFY ....
Were any of the above supported by submissions to Ada9X? If not, why are you
raising the issues now? If so, do you have reason to believe that they
require greater consideration than you expect them to receive?
--
/s/ George vmail: 703/883-6029
email: mitchell@community-chest.mitre.org [alt: gmitchel@mitre.arpa]
snail: GB Mitchell, MITRE, MS Z676, 7525 Colshire Dr, McLean, VA 22102
prev parent reply other threads:[~1990-02-06 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1990-02-02 15:45 10 Commandments for Ada9X Bob Mathis x4232
1990-02-03 21:15 ` William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
1990-02-06 16:32 ` George Mitchell [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox