From: aotto2@my-deja.com
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Free-NET
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 07:36:17 GMT
Date: 2001-01-08T07:36:17+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93bqlh$4v$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: pGb66.50017$xW4.399646@news-server.bigpond.net.au
Hi,
the goal is the time you have to spend to write such an extension,
The CO-Process based implementation taks some days, the full
native implementation in TCL would take weeks or months.
( just remember how difficult it is to write an DB wrapper for
a language )
on of the main features is that you write the CO-Process one
time and can reuse it for every language again and this is an
big improvement.
mfg
aotto :)
> This looks really dumb (or is it just me?) why can't you use the
commands
> with out giveing them to some server? is this a really dodgy multi
threading
> with out multi threadding?(sort of the art of fighting with out
fighting? :)
>
> also what is this .net crud that is the "new" buzzword.. some one
mentioned
> it.. and I can't remember what he said :) some thing about a new
message que
> to replace interprocess communications or some thing? but it's for
multi
> computers or some thing?
>
>
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-08 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-07 16:24 ANNOUNCE: Free-NET aotto2
2001-01-07 18:05 ` Gerhard Häring
2001-01-08 4:50 ` Vortex Vandel
2001-01-08 7:36 ` aotto2 [this message]
2001-01-09 3:24 ` Gerhard Häring
2001-01-09 16:20 ` David Botton
2001-01-10 16:01 ` Ted Dennison
2001-01-10 19:05 ` Juergen Pfeifer
2001-01-11 11:14 ` Tarjei T. Jensen
2001-01-11 13:19 ` Bonobo ( was ANNOUNCE: Free-NET ) Hans-Olof Danielsson
2001-01-11 18:24 ` Ted Dennison
2001-01-10 16:10 ` ANNOUNCE: Free-NET Ng Pheng Siong
2001-01-08 7:30 ` aotto2
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox