From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Ada - to - Perl/CGI translator
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 17:09:04 GMT
Date: 2001-01-06T17:09:04+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <937jfc$s3g$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 86r92hyh6s.fsf@acm.org
In article <86r92hyh6s.fsf@acm.org>,
Laurent Guerby <guerby@acm.org> wrote:
> Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> writes:
> > Oops, I meant GNAT.CGI indeed (Ada.CGI would be an illegal
> > extension of the language :-)
>
> Isn't an implementation free to add children to existing
> language-defined library packages? (GNAT does so.)
An implementation can add grand-children, but not children
to the Ada hierarchy. This is perfectly clear in the RM:
Legality Rules
4 In the standard mode, it is illegal to compile a child of
package Ada.
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-06 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-02 22:39 Ada - to - Perl/CGI translator Bruce or Tracy
2001-01-02 23:23 ` JF Harrison
2001-01-03 0:10 ` Bruce or Tracy
2001-01-03 16:33 ` Ted Dennison
2001-01-05 1:50 ` Bruce or Tracy
2001-01-05 5:27 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-05 6:48 ` Florian Weimer
2001-01-05 14:07 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-05 18:42 ` Laurent Guerby
2001-01-05 21:20 ` Randy Brukardt
2001-01-06 17:09 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2001-01-07 13:39 ` Gisle Sælensminde
2001-01-07 14:05 ` Florian Weimer
2001-01-07 15:53 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-07 15:52 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-06 4:09 ` Bruce or Tracy
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox