From: kronos.arc.nasa.gov!iscnvx!news@ames.arc.nasa.gov
Subject: Real Time Scheduling Methods
Date: 28 Oct 92 17:31:21 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <92302.34020.LJ10891@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM> (raw)
As promised, here is a summary of all mail received on any scheduling
methodology other than Rate Monotonic which can ensure that all time
constraints are fulfilled:
NONE.
Sorry about that guys, but it looks like Rate Monotonic is the only game
in town.
ghaddad@lmsc.lockheed.com
I found these opinions on my doorstep, would you please give them a good home?
next reply other threads:[~1992-10-28 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1992-10-28 17:31 kronos.arc.nasa.gov!iscnvx!news [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1992-10-28 20:34 Real Time Scheduling Methods cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!hobbes.physi
1992-10-28 23:17 Tucker Taft
1992-10-29 5:03 John Goodsen
1992-10-30 19:02 kronos.arc.nasa.gov!iscnvx!news
1992-11-03 14:25 agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!yorkohm!minster!ken
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox