From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: gnat ADA95
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 11:35:33 GMT
Date: 2000-12-21T11:35:33+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <91spu5$tot$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: %Ye06.176147$U46.5521808@news1.sttls1.wa.home.com
In article <%Ye06.176147$U46.5521808@news1.sttls1.wa.home.com>,
"DuckE" <nospam_steved94@home.com> wrote:
> About those version numbers.
> The last public release of GNAT was version 3.13p.
> The new version of GCC (the GNU compiler collection) will
be 3.0.
>
> Is it normal for one of the languages that is a part of GCC
to have a
> different version?
>
> SteveD
In this case, it would cause too much trouble to label the
release of GNAT as 3.0 (since there already was such a release
of GNAT a few years ago). Also, there is no guarantee that
GNAT releases will be syncrhonized with GCC releases, in
particular it is quite likely that GNAT releases will be
more frequent than major GCC releases in the future.
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-21 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <91gqo0$4n9$06$1@news.t-online.com>
2000-12-17 0:02 ` gnat ADA95 Rajagopalan Srinivasan
2000-12-17 20:51 ` Gisle Sælensminde
[not found] ` <91jsld013o5@drn.newsguy.com>
[not found] ` <fYx%5.3471$g37.227987@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
[not found] ` <91nvfo$v72$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
2000-12-19 16:19 ` Mike Silva
2000-12-20 0:35 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-20 0:36 ` Robert Dewar
[not found] ` <wkae9sqmg2.fsf@mail.hex.net>
2000-12-20 20:23 ` William Starner
2000-12-21 0:19 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-21 3:40 ` DuckE
2000-12-21 11:35 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox