From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT Error message
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 20:36:23 GMT
Date: 2000-12-20T20:36:23+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <91r586$kq3$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: V5oHw+onke6g@eisner.decus.org
In article <V5oHw+onke6g@eisner.decus.org>,
Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam (Larry Kilgallen) wrote:
> While a location reference to the declaration sounds quite
> helpful in general, I would suggest that it be suppressed in
> the case of those who have more than one Index_Type in scope,
> giving them some encouragement to change their ways.
>
> This is for the (admittedly low probability) chance that _I_
> might have to maintain their code some day :-)
Sounds like you might like the new warning flag -gnatwh in GNAT
that prevents any hiding of names :-)
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-20 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-17 18:11 GNAT Error message Thierry&Annick
2000-12-18 0:56 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-18 21:58 ` Thierry&Annick
2000-12-19 2:23 ` Ken Garlington
2000-12-19 15:37 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-19 15:56 ` Tucker Taft
2000-12-20 0:38 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-20 17:44 ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-12-20 20:36 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox