From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: RE: Bad coding standards
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:19:27 GMT
Date: 2000-12-14T12:19:27+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <91adsb$ipp$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: B6A1A9B09E52D31183ED00A0C9E0888C469951@nctswashxchg.nctswash.navy.mil
In article
<B6A1A9B09E52D31183ED00A0C9E0888C469951@nctswashxchg.
nctswash.navy.mil>,
comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org wrote:
> I'm not saying coding standards/style guides are
> just aesthetics. Listen to me now. I'm saying
> that "outside" of coding standards that specify
> "which constructs to use" for given situations, you
> are now in the realm of aesthetics.
This seems a mistaken attitude to me. Yes you can
argue like Humpty-Dumpty that words mean anything
you want them to mean, but using the word "esthetics"
too easily implies to too many people that it is just
a matter of prettiness and not important.
In considering the entirety of software performance,
aspects which contribute to maintainability are much
more than just a matter of being pretty. For me, an
error in a comment, or a violation of a coding
standard for layout is a bug in the code, and should
be regarded as such.
Warning: non-Ada diversion
P.S. is aesthetics an allowable spelling in American
english? I don't have an American dictionary at hand.
The OED only permits the use of "e" or the ae letter
which I can't even write in this ASCII character set,
but does not permit a separate a and e character.
Of course one could take the position that the use
of ae in this crippled character set is merely a
short hand for the ae character. It is interesting
that daemon spelled with the ae character is a quite
a bit different from demon with an e. There are
positive and negative meanings of the word demon, and
the OED specifically notes that people often use the
a/e form to emphasize the positive meaning of an
agent that intervenes in a positive way (that's the
meaning that Unix tries to catch, rather than the
negative meaning).
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-14 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-14 2:32 Bad coding standards Beard, Frank
2000-12-14 12:19 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2000-12-14 13:03 ` OT ae [was Re: Bad coding standards] Philip Anderson
2000-12-14 14:08 ` Ken Garlington
2000-12-14 14:19 ` American English (was: Bad coding standards) John English
2000-12-14 15:07 ` Graeme
2000-12-15 13:16 ` The Design Zone (was Re: American English) Marc A. Criley
2000-12-14 15:14 ` American English (was: Bad coding standards) Marin David Condic
2000-12-14 17:38 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-12-15 16:12 ` John English
2000-12-14 14:03 ` Bad coding standards Ken Garlington
2000-12-14 20:14 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-15 1:10 ` Ken Garlington
2000-12-18 16:09 ` Tucker Taft
2000-12-18 18:59 ` Marin David Condic
2000-12-18 22:20 ` Georg Bauhaus
2000-12-19 15:51 ` Tucker Taft
2000-12-19 16:12 ` Marin David Condic
2000-12-19 16:01 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-19 15:49 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-19 16:36 ` Marin David Condic
2000-12-20 1:52 ` Ken Garlington
2000-12-20 12:58 ` Marin David Condic
2000-12-20 14:27 ` Ken Garlington
2000-12-21 23:19 ` Marin David Condic
2001-01-03 19:49 ` Wes Groleau
2001-01-06 19:45 ` Lao Xiao Hai
2000-12-20 11:56 ` Mario Amado Alves
2000-12-19 18:05 ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-12-19 15:42 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-15 0:52 ` Georg Bauhaus
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-12-19 17:46 Beard, Frank
2000-12-15 5:00 Beard, Frank
2000-12-15 14:14 ` Ken Garlington
2000-12-16 1:28 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-18 20:00 ` Robert L. Spooner
2000-12-13 22:23 Beard, Frank
2000-12-13 23:56 ` Ken Garlington
2000-12-14 0:37 ` Ken Garlington
2000-12-14 4:08 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-14 14:06 ` Ken Garlington
2000-12-14 20:15 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-15 5:55 ` Keith
[not found] <910u3p$v9j$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
[not found] ` <3A3445A8.8FC404D5@acm.org>
[not found] ` <912ut9$fga$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
2000-12-12 4:56 ` constant string array Jeff Carter
2000-12-12 20:57 ` Beard, Frank
2000-12-13 0:39 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-13 2:02 ` Beard, Frank
2000-12-13 2:33 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-13 2:55 ` Beard, Frank
2000-12-13 4:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-12-13 13:38 ` Bad coding standards Marc A. Criley
2000-12-13 13:54 ` Ken Garlington
2000-12-13 20:55 ` David Emery
2000-12-14 13:07 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-14 14:21 ` Ken Garlington
2000-12-15 0:08 ` Wayne Magor
2000-12-15 1:40 ` Ken Garlington
2000-12-15 3:18 ` DuckE
2000-12-15 4:45 ` Ed Falis
2000-12-15 15:44 ` Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2000-12-15 16:34 ` Ted Dennison
2000-12-16 6:08 ` Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2000-12-16 1:16 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-16 1:19 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-17 5:49 ` Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2000-12-17 8:24 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-15 15:56 ` Charles H. Sampson
2000-12-15 20:43 ` Wayne Lydecker
2000-12-16 4:31 ` Ken Garlington
2000-12-16 11:36 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-15 21:36 ` tmoran
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox