Performance of access type : a tiny mistake in the WikiBook ?

["Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>]

Hi folks,

I was looking at the WikiBook, the section about access types.

I do not know it is a tiny mistake or something I did not understood.

http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Ada_Programming/Types/access

In one place, it is said “ Depending on the implementation an access
might also render better performance than access all. ” which match
what I had believed for long, but later, there is a list of best to
worst performance comparing access techniques :

“
1) "in" modifier : parameter is passed into the subprogram.
2) "out" modifier : parameter is passed from the subprogram.
3) "in out" modifier : parameter may be modified by the subprogram.
4) access all : access to any (aliased) object.
5) pool access : the access is always within a storage pool and only
checks for not null are performed upon dereference.
6) anonymous access : complex "stack deeps level" checks are needed so
an "anonymous access" can be safely converted from and to an "access
all" or "pool access".
 ”
Pool Access is quoted after Access All, at position 5

Just a detail, but I wonder