From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: RE: Variable length raw-byte data
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 19:26:49 GMT
Date: 2000-12-13T19:26:49+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <918ihd$3gu$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8Mavy1o6gTqY@eisner.decus.org
In article <8Mavy1o6gTqY@eisner.decus.org>,
Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam (Larry Kilgallen)
wrote:
> Is their approach
> now outlawed for Ada 95, or was it outlawed by an
> AI for Ada 83 ?
It was considered to be a ramification in an Ada 83
AI. It is clearly wrong to treat 0 as unlimited in
this context (and silly, because the default if no
such clause is given should be unlimited, the whole
point of a storage size clause is to set a limit).
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-13 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-13 2:56 Variable length raw-byte data Beard, Frank
2000-12-13 15:52 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-13 18:23 ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-12-13 19:26 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-12-13 20:39 Beard, Frank
2000-12-14 13:30 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-12 21:11 Beard, Frank
2000-12-12 21:00 Beard, Frank
2000-12-13 15:48 ` David Botton
2000-12-13 15:51 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2000-12-13 19:34 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-14 8:54 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2000-12-13 23:10 ` Jeff Carter
2000-12-12 3:30 Beard, Frank
2000-12-12 5:54 ` tmoran
2000-12-11 19:38 Julian Morrison
2000-12-12 5:19 ` Jeff Carter
2000-12-13 0:50 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-13 8:56 ` Tristan Gingold
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox