Re: constant string array

[Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>]

In article <9132ng$j10$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  Bjoern.Hofmann@student.fh-nuernberg.de wrote:

>   for I in keywords'range loop
>      if ( keywords(I) = input ) then
>         return True;
>      end if;
>   end loop;

That indeed is a very classical structure.

A couple of comments.

No need to put junk parentheses around conditionals. Yes, it
looks more natural to C programmers, but there is absolutely
no reason to import this style into Ada, it is just noise.

My own taste on spaces (which incidentally is what -gnaty
enforces :-) is

   no space after left paren
   space before left paren if it is a subscript or param list
   no space before right paren

Also in GNAT we avoid the use of the variable I, because in
some screen and printer fonts, it is to hard to distinguish
from a lower case l or from the digit 1.

By the way, this is a case where the warnings about missing
return statements that come from GNAT are really quite useful.
It is surprisingly easy to forget the "return False" here,
and GNAT will remind you.

Finally, please be more economonical in quoting stuff. You
quoted my entire post quite unnecessarily, without even
commenting on it. Quote only the minimum necessary.



Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.