From: Adam Beneschan <adambeneschan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT 4.9 - missing optimization feature?
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 08:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2014-08-06T08:44:51-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <901d160f-12ae-4ad2-bd42-211cedf9ceed@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lrti02$9d0$1@dont-email.me>
On Wednesday, August 6, 2014 8:35:27 AM UTC-7, J-P. Rosen wrote:
> > The point is that code *could* be generated not to call Adjust in the T1 case, but GNAT doesn't do so.
> Yes, but I was asking the OP, where he assumed that the non-existent
> adjust was not called due to optimization...
That isn't how I interpreted his question. But yes, perhaps I should have let him answer for himself.
-- Adam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-06 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-05 22:55 GNAT 4.9 - missing optimization feature? Victor Porton
2014-08-06 14:19 ` Victor Porton
2014-08-06 15:10 ` J-P. Rosen
2014-08-06 15:16 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-08-06 15:35 ` J-P. Rosen
2014-08-06 15:44 ` Adam Beneschan [this message]
2014-08-06 15:15 ` Adam Beneschan
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox