From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Here we go again...
Date: 2000/11/21
Date: 2000-11-21T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ve6kt$m0m$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3A1A2085.287ADB7C@mail.utexas.edu
In article <3A1A2085.287ADB7C@mail.utexas.edu>,
"Bobby D. Bryant" <bdbryant@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> People don't seem to stop and think about how asinine it is to
> use "designed by committee" as an attempted slur in the world
> of technology.
Actually I disagree, I think that design by committee is
probably often a bad thing in programming language design.
Certainly that's what we decided for Ada, which is why we
did NOT use the approach of design by committee for Ada!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-21 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-10 2:16 Here we go again dale
2000-11-09 0:00 ` Lao Xiao Hai
2000-11-10 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-11-10 3:50 ` dale
2000-11-10 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
2000-11-10 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
[not found] ` <vhi4s1fihvu.fsf@grotte.ifi.uio.no>
2000-11-11 0:57 ` Juergen Pfeifer
2000-11-12 0:00 ` Laurent Guerby
2000-11-11 7:25 ` Tarjei Tj�stheim Jensen
2000-11-11 0:00 ` gdemont
2000-11-12 0:00 ` Robert Love
2000-11-12 0:00 ` Tarjei Tj�stheim Jensen
2000-11-11 0:00 ` Marin David Condic
2000-11-21 7:13 ` Bobby D. Bryant
2000-11-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2000-11-21 0:00 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2000-11-22 5:07 ` Robert Dewar
2000-11-21 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox