* anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list? @ 2001-09-29 21:00 mike_ 2001-09-30 2:24 ` DuckE 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: mike_ @ 2001-09-29 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw) this page no longer exist: http://www.act-europe.fr/texts/news/product_updates/newfeatures_set.htm was wondering if anyone knows of a different link, or have the list saved to post it here. i wanted to find out an idea of new features in gnat 3.14p. thanks, /m ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list? 2001-09-29 21:00 anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list? mike_ @ 2001-09-30 2:24 ` DuckE 2001-09-30 5:21 ` mike 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: DuckE @ 2001-09-30 2:24 UTC (permalink / raw) It must have been temporarily gone, it's up now. SteveD "mike_@nospam" <mike__member@newsguy.com> wrote in message news:9p5cp3014ut@drn.newsguy.com... > this page no longer exist: > > http://www.act-europe.fr/texts/news/product_updates/newfeatures_set.htm > > was wondering if anyone knows of a different link, or have the list saved > to post it here. i wanted to find out an idea of new features in gnat 3.14p. > > > thanks, > /m > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list? 2001-09-30 2:24 ` DuckE @ 2001-09-30 5:21 ` mike 2001-09-30 13:15 ` Robert Dewar ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: mike @ 2001-09-30 5:21 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <6nvt7.55822$QK.36784758@news1.sttln1.wa.home.com>, "DuckE" says... > >It must have been temporarily gone, it's up now. > >SteveD > >"mike_@nospam" <mike__member@newsguy.com> wrote in message >news:9p5cp3014ut@drn.newsguy.com... >> this page no longer exist: >> >> http://www.act-europe.fr/texts/news/product_updates/newfeatures_set.htm >> guess what, when you said the above, I went and checked and I get a blank page. Then I suspected the browser, so I switched to IE, and now the page shows up! The first browser I treid is Netscape 6.1 on win 2k. this is strange. may be there is something on that page that prevents it being showsn on netscape 6.1 on windows. but thanks again for checking. I can see it now on IE. mike ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list? 2001-09-30 5:21 ` mike @ 2001-09-30 13:15 ` Robert Dewar 2001-09-30 19:52 ` Al Christians 2001-10-01 15:25 ` Ted Dennison 2001-09-30 14:17 ` Robert Dewar 2001-10-01 13:56 ` anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list? Ted Dennison 2 siblings, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Robert Dewar @ 2001-09-30 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw) mike@nospam <mike_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message news:<9p6a5n02tgp@drn.newsguy.com>... > The first browser I treid is Netscape 6.1 on win 2k. > > this is strange. may be there is something on that page that prevents > it being showsn on netscape 6.1 on windows. > > but thanks again for checking. I can see it now on IE. > > mike That's really horrible! I have notified our Web people to check it out. As someone who always deletes IE from any machine I get my hands on, and replaces it with Netscape, that won't do! I can by the way see the page just fine with my old V4 Netscape on OS/2. Isn't the world of standardized browsing on the world wide net nice? :-) Robert Dewar Ada Core Technologies ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list? 2001-09-30 13:15 ` Robert Dewar @ 2001-09-30 19:52 ` Al Christians 2001-10-01 15:25 ` Ted Dennison 1 sibling, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Al Christians @ 2001-09-30 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw) The page gives a couple of syntax errors when viewed with Amaya. Netscape may be better than IE in various regards, but it is fussier, and it will often show nothing if a page has syntax errors. The page in question, however, does show up ok under Netscape 4.77. Al Robert Dewar wrote: > > mike@nospam <mike_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message news:<9p6a5n02tgp@drn.newsguy.com>... > > The first browser I treid is Netscape 6.1 on win 2k. > > > > this is strange. may be there is something on that page that prevents > > it being showsn on netscape 6.1 on windows. > > > > but thanks again for checking. I can see it now on IE. > > > > mike > > That's really horrible! I have notified our Web people > to check it out. As someone who always deletes IE from > any machine I get my hands on, and replaces it with > Netscape, that won't do! I can by the way see the page > just fine with my old V4 Netscape on OS/2. > > Isn't the world of standardized browsing on the world > wide net nice? :-) > > Robert Dewar > Ada Core Technologies ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list? 2001-09-30 13:15 ` Robert Dewar 2001-09-30 19:52 ` Al Christians @ 2001-10-01 15:25 ` Ted Dennison 2001-10-01 15:44 ` Larry Kilgallen 2001-10-02 12:52 ` Georg Bauhaus 1 sibling, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Ted Dennison @ 2001-10-01 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <5ee5b646.0109300515.760595cc@posting.google.com>, Robert Dewar says... > >That's really horrible! I have notified our Web people >to check it out. As someone who always deletes IE from >any machine I get my hands on, and replaces it with >Netscape, that won't do! I can by the way see the page >just fine with my old V4 Netscape on OS/2. (My first reply got lost in the ether. My apologies if both show up.) I'm in pretty much the same boat, except that I keep InternetExploder around as an emergency backup. If this is an issue that you care deeply about, I highly suggest you mandate use of the HTML validator at http://validator.w3.org/ , and require that no pages get posted unless all errors and warnings are fixed. I have come to consider that page my HTML "compiler". --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list? 2001-10-01 15:25 ` Ted Dennison @ 2001-10-01 15:44 ` Larry Kilgallen 2001-10-01 16:25 ` Ted Dennison 2001-10-02 12:52 ` Georg Bauhaus 1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Larry Kilgallen @ 2001-10-01 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <pV%t7.11184$ev2.17092@www.newsranger.com>, Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com> writes: > In article <5ee5b646.0109300515.760595cc@posting.google.com>, Robert Dewar > says... >> >>That's really horrible! I have notified our Web people >>to check it out. As someone who always deletes IE from >>any machine I get my hands on, and replaces it with >>Netscape, that won't do! I can by the way see the page >>just fine with my old V4 Netscape on OS/2. > > (My first reply got lost in the ether. My apologies if both show up.) > > I'm in pretty much the same boat, except that I keep InternetExploder around as > an emergency backup. If this is an issue that you care deeply about, I highly > suggest you mandate use of the HTML validator at http://validator.w3.org/ , and > require that no pages get posted unless all errors and warnings are fixed. I > have come to consider that page my HTML "compiler". While I also encourage the use of http://validator.w3.org/ every time I have an opportunity to make such a comment, I believe this _particular_ error is not caught by that tool. I know it does not catch pages that specify one of (text or background) but not the other, which in the case of white and black will lead to errors on half the browsers in use (depending on how their defaults are set). So while http://validator.w3.org/ is good, it too has some defects. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list? 2001-10-01 15:44 ` Larry Kilgallen @ 2001-10-01 16:25 ` Ted Dennison 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Ted Dennison @ 2001-10-01 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <8ubgEAAHWFxg@eisner.encompasserve.org>, Larry Kilgallen says... > >In article <pV%t7.11184$ev2.17092@www.newsranger.com>, Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com> writes: >> have come to consider that page my HTML "compiler". > >While I also encourage the use of http://validator.w3.org/ every time >I have an opportunity to make such a comment, I believe this _particular_ >error is not caught by that tool. I know it does not catch pages that Well yes. Just like any compiler (including Ada compilers), it can't catch every conceivable usage error. But the more machine help you have, the better. --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list? 2001-10-01 15:25 ` Ted Dennison 2001-10-01 15:44 ` Larry Kilgallen @ 2001-10-02 12:52 ` Georg Bauhaus 1 sibling, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Georg Bauhaus @ 2001-10-02 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw) Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> wrote: : : If this is an issue that you care deeply about, I highly : suggest you mandate use of the HTML validator at : http://validator.w3.org/ , and There exists an excellent, and free (incl. sources), conforming SGML system by James Clark, including several checkers and translators, at http://www.jclark.com/sp/index.htm. If your HTML document passes that, you can have some confidence in the HTML text, no matter what browser. -- Georg --- This page is best viewed as text. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list? 2001-09-30 5:21 ` mike 2001-09-30 13:15 ` Robert Dewar @ 2001-09-30 14:17 ` Robert Dewar 2001-10-01 14:16 ` Robert Dewar 2001-10-01 13:56 ` anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list? Ted Dennison 2 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Robert Dewar @ 2001-09-30 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw) mike@nospam <mike_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message news:<9p6a5n02tgp@drn.newsguy.com>... > The first browser I treid is Netscape 6.1 on win 2k. > > this is strange. may be there is something on that page that prevents > it being showsn on netscape 6.1 on windows. > > but thanks again for checking. I can see it now on IE. > > mike It turns out that *only* netscape 6 handles this page properly. The HTML says white text on a white background (yes, yes, that's not a very good choice :-) :-) and both IE, and Netscape 4 fail to follow this direction. We will fix it, thanks for pointing it out Isn't the world of portable browsing wonderful :-) Robert Dewar Ada Core Technologies ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list? 2001-09-30 14:17 ` Robert Dewar @ 2001-10-01 14:16 ` Robert Dewar 2001-10-01 15:30 ` Ted Dennison ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Robert Dewar @ 2001-10-01 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw) dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) wrote in message news:<5ee5b646.0109300617.61bf58e0@posting.google.com>... > It turns out that *only* netscape 6 handles this page > properly. The HTML says white text on a white background > (yes, yes, that's not a very good choice :-) :-) and both > IE, and Netscape 4 fail to follow this direction. We will > fix it, thanks for pointing it out This is now fixed, and the text is black on white, and fussy netscape 6 can now read it :-) In future, it is a good idea to send a note of a problem with our web site to report@gnat.com. I only occasionally read CLA, and skip most threads, so if the only notification of such a problem is in CLA, it is likely to be missed. Robert Dewar Ada Core Technologies ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list? 2001-10-01 14:16 ` Robert Dewar @ 2001-10-01 15:30 ` Ted Dennison 2001-10-02 6:32 ` Quality checking of code (Was: Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list?) Anders Wirzenius 2001-10-02 6:40 ` GNAT reporting, was (Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list?) Anders Wirzenius 2 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Ted Dennison @ 2001-10-01 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <5ee5b646.0110010616.5b332f1a@posting.google.com>, Robert Dewar says... > >dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) wrote in message news:<5ee5b646.0109300617.61bf58e0@posting.google.com>... > >> It turns out that *only* netscape 6 handles this page >> properly. The HTML says white text on a white background >> (yes, yes, that's not a very good choice :-) :-) and both >> IE, and Netscape 4 fail to follow this direction. We will >> fix it, thanks for pointing it out > >This is now fixed, and the text is black on white, and >fussy netscape 6 can now read it :-) Its still invalid HTML, according to the validator at w3.org . Its missing a "<!DOCTYPE>" tag. In the interest of fairness, I should report that my homepage below isn't valid either (3 vanilla errors, 1 fatal error). One of these days I'll go back and fix my old pages... --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Quality checking of code (Was: Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list?) 2001-10-01 14:16 ` Robert Dewar 2001-10-01 15:30 ` Ted Dennison @ 2001-10-02 6:32 ` Anders Wirzenius 2001-10-02 12:31 ` Quality checking of code Florian Weimer 2001-10-02 6:40 ` GNAT reporting, was (Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list?) Anders Wirzenius 2 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Anders Wirzenius @ 2001-10-02 6:32 UTC (permalink / raw) Robert Dewar wrote in message <5ee5b646.0110010616.5b332f1a@posting.google.com>... >dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) wrote in message news:<5ee5b646.0109300617.61bf58e0@posting.google.com>... > >> It turns out that *only* netscape 6 handles this page >> properly. The HTML says white text on a white background >> (yes, yes, that's not a very good choice :-) :-) and both >> IE, and Netscape 4 fail to follow this direction. We will >> fix it, thanks for pointing it out > >This is now fixed, and the text is black on white, and >fussy netscape 6 can now read it :-) FWIW: A way to do syntax checking on code is to view it using an editor showing the items with syntax highlighting(comments are green, tags are blue, attributes are red, attribute values are yellow...). I viewed the code in the lower frame on the http://www.act-europe.fr/texts/news/product_updates/newfeatures_set.htm through such an editor and it revealed for example a missing '=' between the attribute marginwidth and the value "0" in the <body> tag. The file name appeared as prod_newfeature.htm: <body link="#0099ff" alink="#0033ff" vlink="#006db6" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth"0" text="black" background="../../../media/fond.gif"> > >In future, it is a good idea to send a note of a problem >with our web site to report@gnat.com. I only occasionally >read CLA, and skip most threads, so if the only notification of such a >problem is in CLA, it is likely >to be missed. Done > >Robert Dewar >Ada Core Technologies Anders Wirzenius ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: Quality checking of code 2001-10-02 6:32 ` Quality checking of code (Was: Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list?) Anders Wirzenius @ 2001-10-02 12:31 ` Florian Weimer 2001-10-02 18:24 ` Robert Dewar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Florian Weimer @ 2001-10-02 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw) "Anders Wirzenius" <anders.wirzenius@pp.qnet.fi> writes: > >This is now fixed, and the text is black on white, and > >fussy netscape 6 can now read it :-) > > FWIW: > A way to do syntax checking on code is to view it using an editor showing > the items with syntax highlighting(comments are green, tags are blue, > attributes are red, attribute values are yellow...). Of course, the proper way to check the syntax of HTML documents is to use a SGML validator. Although some editors contain with fairly complete SGML parsers, special tools do a much better job. (The syntactic requirements of SGML-based HTML are quite complex.) After all, in order to check the syntax of an Ada program, you don't use a text editor, right? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: Quality checking of code 2001-10-02 12:31 ` Quality checking of code Florian Weimer @ 2001-10-02 18:24 ` Robert Dewar 2001-10-02 19:42 ` Ted Dennison 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Robert Dewar @ 2001-10-02 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw) Florian Weimer <Florian.Weimer@RUS.Uni-Stuttgart.DE> wrote in message news:<tgpu86mdel.fsf_-_@mercury.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>... > Of course, the proper way to check the syntax of HTML documents is to > use a SGML validator. Although some editors contain with fairly > complete SGML parsers, special tools do a much better job. (The > syntactic requirements of SGML-based HTML are quite complex.) Of course, as I understand it, there was no syntax error in our page, just a poor choice of colors (white on white) that for some reason was mishandled (in a user friendly manner) by both IE (all versions) and older versions of Netscape :-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: Quality checking of code 2001-10-02 18:24 ` Robert Dewar @ 2001-10-02 19:42 ` Ted Dennison 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Ted Dennison @ 2001-10-02 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <5ee5b646.0110021024.74e392ef@posting.google.com>, Robert Dewar says... >Of course, as I understand it, there was no syntax error >in our page, just a poor choice of colors (white on white) >that for some reason was mishandled (in a user friendly >manner) by both IE (all versions) and older versions of >Netscape :-) That's correct, as far as the original problem was concerned. However, it would not be perfectly true to say that "there was no syntax error on that page". In fact, there were and still are several. For one thing, there is no <!DOCTYPE> tag, as required by the standard. That's a fatal error for the W3C validator, and it can check no further. If I tell it to assume HTML 3.2 and ignore the (bad) header, it pulls 10 syntax errors. At least one of those errors is quite visible to Mozilla. The entire contents of the main frame were put into a hyperlink with the rather amusing target of "(Empty Reference!)". Due to this error, any attempt to click *anywhere* within that frame with my Mozilla browser nets me a page transition to: Not Found The requested URL /texts/news/product_updates/(Empty Reference!) was not found on this server. --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* GNAT reporting, was (Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list?) 2001-10-01 14:16 ` Robert Dewar 2001-10-01 15:30 ` Ted Dennison 2001-10-02 6:32 ` Quality checking of code (Was: Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list?) Anders Wirzenius @ 2001-10-02 6:40 ` Anders Wirzenius 2001-10-02 10:07 ` Robert Dewar 2001-10-02 13:54 ` Wes Groleau 2 siblings, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Anders Wirzenius @ 2001-10-02 6:40 UTC (permalink / raw) Robert Dewar wrote in message <5ee5b646.0110010616.5b332f1a@posting.google.com>... >dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) wrote in message news:<5ee5b646.0109300617.61bf58e0@posting.google.com>... > >In future, it is a good idea to send a note of a problem >with our web site to report@gnat.com. I only occasionally >read CLA, and skip most threads, so if the only notification of such a >problem is in CLA, it is likely >to be missed. > >Robert Dewar >Ada Core Technologies I posted something to this thread and put report@gnat.com in the Cc field and got the following reply: <quote> Your message to report@gnat.com is being returned unopened. We could not process your request. If you are a supported customer, please follow the procedure that was communicated to you. If you are reporting a problem with the public version of GNAT, please use a meaningful subject line containing the string "GNAT". We are sorry for the inconvenience, but we need to follow these rules to make sure that customer problems are properly processed at high priority, and that report@gnat.com is protected from spam. Thanks for your cooperation. Thank you for using GNAT. -- The GNAT support team </quote> I'll try once again by including "GNAT" in the subject line. Anders Wirzenius ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT reporting, was (Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list?) 2001-10-02 6:40 ` GNAT reporting, was (Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list?) Anders Wirzenius @ 2001-10-02 10:07 ` Robert Dewar 2001-10-02 13:54 ` Wes Groleau 1 sibling, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Robert Dewar @ 2001-10-02 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw) "Anders Wirzenius" <anders.wirzenius@pp.qnet.fi> wrote in message news:<Rjdu7.35$3e4.2421@read2.inet.fi>... > I posted something to this thread and put report@gnat.com > in the Cc field and got the following reply: Messages to report@gnat.com should go only to report@gnat.com to avoid any problem with chatter in replies to other addresses. Thanks for following this rule. > I'll try once again by including "GNAT" in the subject > line. As noted, the string GNAT is required in the subject line as a spam preventer. But of course this is OBE since the problem has been fixed as noted with posts to this group. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT reporting, was (Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list?) 2001-10-02 6:40 ` GNAT reporting, was (Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list?) Anders Wirzenius 2001-10-02 10:07 ` Robert Dewar @ 2001-10-02 13:54 ` Wes Groleau 1 sibling, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Wes Groleau @ 2001-10-02 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw) Anders Wirzenius wrote: > I posted something to this thread and put report@gnat.com in the Cc field > and got the following reply: Perhaps they've changed their policy. message used to include that they didn't accept "crossposted" messages at 'report' -- Wes Groleau http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list? 2001-09-30 5:21 ` mike 2001-09-30 13:15 ` Robert Dewar 2001-09-30 14:17 ` Robert Dewar @ 2001-10-01 13:56 ` Ted Dennison 2 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Ted Dennison @ 2001-10-01 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <9p6a5n02tgp@drn.newsguy.com>, mike@nospam says... > >>> http://www.act-europe.fr/texts/news/product_updates/newfeatures_set.htm > >guess what, when you said the above, I went and checked and I get >a blank page. Then I suspected the browser, so I switched to IE, and >now the page shows up! > >The first browser I treid is Netscape 6.1 on win 2k. Using Mozilla 0.9.4 on Win2k it shows up just fine. --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-10-02 19:42 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2001-09-29 21:00 anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list? mike_ 2001-09-30 2:24 ` DuckE 2001-09-30 5:21 ` mike 2001-09-30 13:15 ` Robert Dewar 2001-09-30 19:52 ` Al Christians 2001-10-01 15:25 ` Ted Dennison 2001-10-01 15:44 ` Larry Kilgallen 2001-10-01 16:25 ` Ted Dennison 2001-10-02 12:52 ` Georg Bauhaus 2001-09-30 14:17 ` Robert Dewar 2001-10-01 14:16 ` Robert Dewar 2001-10-01 15:30 ` Ted Dennison 2001-10-02 6:32 ` Quality checking of code (Was: Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list?) Anders Wirzenius 2001-10-02 12:31 ` Quality checking of code Florian Weimer 2001-10-02 18:24 ` Robert Dewar 2001-10-02 19:42 ` Ted Dennison 2001-10-02 6:40 ` GNAT reporting, was (Re: anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list?) Anders Wirzenius 2001-10-02 10:07 ` Robert Dewar 2001-10-02 13:54 ` Wes Groleau 2001-10-01 13:56 ` anyone has link for 3.14 release notes or feature list? Ted Dennison
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox