From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Ada vs. C++ in defense projects
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 04:35:57 GMT
Date: 2000-11-05T04:35:57+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8u2o3d$hft$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3A04C67F.FEB1D90A@netwood.net
In article <3A04C67F.FEB1D90A@netwood.net>,
"E. Robert Tisdale" <edwin@netwood.net> wrote:
> If you can find an Ada compiler which emits byte code for a
> JVM,
> you may be able to convince them that they should implement
> safety critical applications in Ada instead of Java.
> Otherwise, you should probably just forget about Ada.
JGNAT from Ada Core Technologies is such a system ....
Robert Dewar
Ada Core Technologies
www.gnat.com
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-05 4:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-03 0:00 Ada vs. C++ in defense projects michael_p_card
2000-11-04 0:00 ` Tom Hargraves
2000-11-05 2:31 ` E. Robert Tisdale
2000-11-04 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
2000-11-05 4:35 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2000-11-05 5:42 ` E. Robert Tisdale
2000-11-05 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2000-11-06 0:00 ` John Griffiths
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-10-30 16:04 Is the Ada World Embarrassed by the Defense Industry? Ken Garlington
2000-10-30 21:36 ` E. Robert Tisdale
2000-10-31 4:10 ` Lao Xiao Hai
2000-10-31 16:50 ` mjsilva
2000-11-03 0:00 ` Ada vs. C++ in defense projects Michael P. Card
2000-11-04 0:00 ` Jeff Stimson
2000-11-04 0:00 ` Robert Love
2000-11-04 0:00 ` E. Robert Tisdale
2000-11-05 0:57 ` Jeff Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox