From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: User defined boolean
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 19:48:28 GMT
Date: 2000-10-31T19:48:28+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8tn7m9$9df$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: VprL5.34497$E85.876306@news1.sttls1.wa.home.com
In article <VprL5.34497$E85.876306@news1.sttls1.wa.home.com>,
"DuckE" <nospam_steved94@home.com> wrote:
> You're absolutely right! I meant to say "overload" not
> "override".
Ah yes, sorry, I should have figured that out, and yes, of
course overload is exactly the right term!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-10-31 19:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-29 0:41 User defined boolean Daniel Allex
2000-10-29 1:22 ` Ken Garlington
2000-10-30 1:02 ` DuckE
2000-10-30 1:58 ` Robert Dewar
2000-10-31 3:56 ` DuckE
2000-10-31 19:48 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox