From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Redefined "=" = generic disaster?
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 18:46:41 GMT
Date: 2000-10-30T18:46:41+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8tkfme$v8a$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 39FCEFAD.56BE85B1@ix.netcom.com
In article <39FCEFAD.56BE85B1@ix.netcom.com>,
Lao Xiao Hai <laoxhai@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> Could not resist posting this package specification and body
> in response to your challenge Robert.
OK, you posted the code. My request was to post code that did
something other than what you would expect from reading the
code. I can't see that this is true, but then I am not
telepathic, I cannot guess what peculiar expectations you
might have.
Please explain why this code does something different from
what you expect?
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-10-30 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-21 6:59 Redefined "=" = generic disaster? Vincent Marciante
2000-10-21 0:00 ` Jeff Carter
2000-10-21 0:00 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-10-28 11:12 ` Robert Dewar
2000-10-29 8:43 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-10-30 3:49 ` Lao Xiao Hai
2000-10-30 18:46 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2000-10-31 3:27 ` Lao Xiao Hai
2000-10-31 6:54 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-10-31 19:51 ` Robert Dewar
2000-11-01 17:47 ` Mats Weber
2000-11-02 5:27 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-11-02 16:52 ` Mats Weber
2000-11-02 14:59 ` Tucker Taft
2000-11-05 4:29 ` Robert Dewar
2000-11-05 4:32 ` Robert Dewar
2000-11-05 4:26 ` Robert Dewar
2000-10-21 0:00 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-10-22 2:50 ` Jeff Carter
2000-10-22 0:00 ` Vincent Marciante
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox