From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: User defined boolean
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 01:58:26 GMT
Date: 2000-10-30T01:58:26+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8tikk1$g7q$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3N3L5.30691$E85.782438@news1.sttls1.wa.home.com
In article <3N3L5.30691$E85.782438@news1.sttls1.wa.home.com>,
"DuckE" <nospam_steved94@home.com> wrote:
> You can certainly override the built in AND and OR operations
> to work for your new type:
Bad terminology! This has nothing whatsoever to do with
overriding, since surely there ARE no AND/OR operations
for the type, so what the above *should* say is simply
"You can certainly define AND and OR operations to work for
your new type (whatever your definition of working might be!)"
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-10-30 1:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-29 0:41 User defined boolean Daniel Allex
2000-10-29 1:22 ` Ken Garlington
2000-10-30 1:02 ` DuckE
2000-10-30 1:58 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2000-10-31 3:56 ` DuckE
2000-10-31 19:48 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox