From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Redefined "=" = generic disaster?
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 11:12:12 GMT
Date: 2000-10-28T11:12:12+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8tecab$epm$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 39F1F686.26B5@li.net
In article <39F1F686.26B5@li.net>,
Vincent Marciante <marciant@li.net> wrote:
> I still think that this all opens up the possibility of more
> unexpected results in Ada 95 than it did in Ada 83.
I don't see it. Of course anything can be unexpected to anyone
depending on what they know and what they expect :-)
Please post exact Ada 95 code that works (check it out first)
and does something you consider unexpected.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-10-28 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-21 6:59 Redefined "=" = generic disaster? Vincent Marciante
2000-10-21 0:00 ` Jeff Carter
2000-10-21 0:00 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-10-22 2:50 ` Jeff Carter
2000-10-22 0:00 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-10-21 0:00 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-10-28 11:12 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2000-10-29 8:43 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-10-30 3:49 ` Lao Xiao Hai
2000-10-30 18:46 ` Robert Dewar
2000-10-31 3:27 ` Lao Xiao Hai
2000-10-31 6:54 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-10-31 19:51 ` Robert Dewar
2000-11-01 17:47 ` Mats Weber
2000-11-02 5:27 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-11-02 16:52 ` Mats Weber
2000-11-02 14:59 ` Tucker Taft
2000-11-05 4:29 ` Robert Dewar
2000-11-05 4:32 ` Robert Dewar
2000-11-05 4:26 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox