From: dvdeug@x8b4e516e.dhcp.okstate.edu (David Starner)
Subject: Re: access type question (maybe a little silly)
Date: 20 Oct 2000 02:01:49 GMT
Date: 2000-10-20T02:01:49+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8so92d$8a23@news.cis.okstate.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: lXMH5.902$Xs6.91167@nnrp1.sbc.net
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:09:33 -0500, Pat Rogers wrote:
>If you're running an application that executes for a very long time,
>then you might want to do the reclamation. If you're running a
>desktop, one-off, short-lived application, then it probably won't be
>worth the effort.
I've never seen a program big enough to need access types that wasn't
worth it to try and collect it. I have, on the other hand, seen several
small programs become quite a nuiscence by eating up hundreds of megabytes
of memory in seconds. If you've got a program that inputs files, remember
that the next guy will try to load a 100 MB picture/a half gig of mp3s/
the collected works of Shakespeare through your program.
--
David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org
http://dvdeug.dhis.org
If you wish to strive for peace of soul then believe;
if you wish to be a devotee of truth, then inquire.
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-10-20 2:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-19 0:00 access type question (maybe a little silly) Carles
2000-10-19 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
2000-10-20 2:01 ` David Starner [this message]
2000-10-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-10-20 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
2000-10-20 0:34 ` Ted Dennison
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox