* urgent question to maintain the ada-language inside the enterprise @ 2000-09-12 18:27 DC 2000-09-13 0:00 ` bill ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: DC @ 2000-09-12 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw) hello, Can anyone help me ? a. We are currently working (design and analysis maintenance) with a toolcase : TEAMWORK on unix servers(programming language : ada). We would like to work on windowsNT instead and continue working with ada Does anyone currently work with the case tool TEAMWORK (cadre) for windowsNT, or has knowledge of persons, firms that do so ? Could you please give us some poc ? b. Our second option is to change to a new case tool. Can anyone recomment a good, solid case tool or give some references ? c. The entire development (design and analysis) has been made with the case tool teamwork. For all packages , procedures,... we have a graphical view made with the case tool. That allows to maintain the application in a much clearer way. it would be most favorable if all of that work could be transformed toward the new case tool. Are there case tools which allow to do such a transfer and is it possible for the case tools you have recommended ? thx in advance Christof ps. Could you please reply to the following adress : christof.denolf@army.mil.be ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: urgent question to maintain the ada-language inside the enterprise 2000-09-12 18:27 urgent question to maintain the ada-language inside the enterprise DC @ 2000-09-13 0:00 ` bill 2000-09-12 0:00 ` DPH 2000-09-27 0:00 ` Michael S. Simpson 2000-09-28 0:00 ` Greg Gorman 2 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: bill @ 2000-09-13 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <Vzuv5.2264$R_2.37188@afrodite.telenet-ops.be>, "DC" says... > >hello, > Can anyone help me ? > > a. We are currently working (design and analysis maintenance) with a >toolcase : TEAMWORK on unix > servers(programming language : ada). > We would like to work on windowsNT instead and continue working >with ada I'd just LOVE to hear the logic and the reasoning behind such a move. To leave Unix programming env. and to move to windows? It must be that DOS batch files are so much more powerfull than bash shell scripts, or may be windows has more pretty colors? let me see, it must be that your programmers prefer to point and click more? btw, if you want pretty colors and point and click, it is all now on Unix. see http://www.gnome.org and http://www.kde.org. Sun Solaris next OS version will have gnome as its default desktop. Now since your got your point and click and colors on Unix, do you still really want to move to windows/DOS ? Bill ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: urgent question to maintain the ada-language inside the enterprise 2000-09-13 0:00 ` bill @ 2000-09-12 0:00 ` DPH 2000-09-25 4:31 ` Robert Dewar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: DPH @ 2000-09-12 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) Maybe its the fact that our particular Ada project using Green Hills Ada compiles in 21 minutes on our supposedly quick (1 yr old, 4 processors) Sun computer, and 16 minutes on the Green Hills equipped PC? Or maybe they have gotten sick of a particluar piece of cranky hardware that repeatedly fails on their multi-user Unix machine that throws the entire team into ldleness until it is fixed a week later, as opposed to the HW failure on a PC that only affects 1 person, for whom a whole new computer can be bought and configured in less than a week instead of waiting for repair from the Big City? Our project has considered moving to the PC environment for these reasons. Plus there is the price of the average SUN machine vs. the price of a fast NT Workstation. Everone on the project has a PC as part of working at the site anyway, so the Unix machine is really redundant. Maybe if companies like SUN would make a decent attempt to build personal computers for home use, things would be different. Dave Head bill@nospammail.com wrote: > In article <Vzuv5.2264$R_2.37188@afrodite.telenet-ops.be>, "DC" says... > > > >hello, > > Can anyone help me ? > > > > a. We are currently working (design and analysis maintenance) with a > >toolcase : TEAMWORK on unix > > servers(programming language : ada). > > We would like to work on windowsNT instead and continue working > >with ada > > I'd just LOVE to hear the logic and the reasoning behind such a move. > > To leave Unix programming env. and to move to windows? > > It must be that DOS batch files are so much more powerfull than bash shell > scripts, or may be windows has more pretty colors? let me see, it must > be that your programmers prefer to point and click more? > > btw, if you want pretty colors and point and click, it is all now > on Unix. see http://www.gnome.org and http://www.kde.org. Sun Solaris > next OS version will have gnome as its default desktop. > > Now since your got your point and click and colors on Unix, do you > still really want to move to windows/DOS ? > > Bill ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: urgent question to maintain the ada-language inside the enterprise 2000-09-12 0:00 ` DPH @ 2000-09-25 4:31 ` Robert Dewar 2000-09-25 0:00 ` peter ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Robert Dewar @ 2000-09-25 4:31 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <39BE218D.B26DF3FD@kg.hsanet.net>, rally2xs@compuserve.com wrote: > Our project has considered moving to the PC environment for > these reasons. There are many legitimate reasons to consider using PC's not least of which is price performance, however, despite what Microsoft might like you to think, moving to PC's does not necessarily mean moving to NT. GNAT currently supports the following operating systems on PC's Linux SCO Unix Solaris x86 OS/2 Lynx and yes NT in addition, there are volunteer ports for some other x86 OS's including netbsd and freebsd. So you still have quite a bit of choice :-) Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: urgent question to maintain the ada-language inside the enterprise 2000-09-25 4:31 ` Robert Dewar @ 2000-09-25 0:00 ` peter 2000-09-26 0:00 ` DPH 2000-09-26 20:55 ` Chris Miller 2 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: peter @ 2000-09-25 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <8qmkfo$blb$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, Robert says... >There are many legitimate reasons to consider using PC's not >least of which is price performance, There used to be a distinction between the 'pc' and the workstation some years ago, this is now all gone. nowadays, one can get a 'pc' that is more powerfull than the most powerfull workstation few years ago, and more powerfull than a mainframe or a 'mini' computer few years ago also. nowadays one can also buy a Sun workstation for just about the price of a 'pc'. Actually, it is impossible to know these days what is the difference between a 'pc' and a workstation. peter ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: urgent question to maintain the ada-language inside the enterprise 2000-09-25 4:31 ` Robert Dewar 2000-09-25 0:00 ` peter @ 2000-09-26 0:00 ` DPH 2000-09-26 20:55 ` Chris Miller 2 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: DPH @ 2000-09-26 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) Robert Dewar wrote: > In article <39BE218D.B26DF3FD@kg.hsanet.net>, > rally2xs@compuserve.com wrote: > > > Our project has considered moving to the PC environment for > > these reasons. > > There are many legitimate reasons to consider using PC's not > least of which is price performance, Yes, they're pretty cheap. > however, despite what > Microsoft might like you to think, moving to PC's does not > necessarily mean moving to NT. > > GNAT currently supports the following operating systems on PC's > > Linux > SCO Unix > Solaris x86 > OS/2 > Lynx > > and yes > > NT > > in addition, there are volunteer ports for some other x86 > OS's including netbsd and freebsd. > > So you still have quite a bit of choice :-) Don't think too many of the folks will want give up Microsoft Office when their desktop PC is converted to Linux or Unix or whatever, nor spend the extra time necessary to get familiar with whatever utilities are used to do the common stuff like packing and unpacking zip files, running streaming audio and video, etc. Also, Microsoft Outlook is the _official corporate_ e-mail program, so rebooting periodically to download e-mail would be a drag. No, only NT or W2000 would really make sense for us in our present environment, unless we were going to buy standalone machines to boot to Unix and leave running, just for developonig software. But then there goes the $$$ savings when compared with just using the current PC. Dave Head ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: urgent question to maintain the ada-language inside the enterprise 2000-09-25 4:31 ` Robert Dewar 2000-09-25 0:00 ` peter 2000-09-26 0:00 ` DPH @ 2000-09-26 20:55 ` Chris Miller 2000-09-26 0:00 ` nospam 2 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Chris Miller @ 2000-09-26 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw) > There are many legitimate reasons to consider using PC's not > least of which is price performance, however, despite what > Microsoft might like you to think, moving to PC's does not > necessarily mean moving to NT. And it doesn't have to be one or the other. My current favorite platform is a dual boot PC with (NT4/W2000) and Linux. This gives the best of both worlds, and you only need a single box on the desk. You can use MS Office to do all the usual corporate stuff (Staroffice isn't quite there yet), then hit ctrl-alt-del, and you have all the good old Unix "pigs in mud" Makefiles, CVS, editors, shell scripts and more. I do most Ada programming on Linux. I see this as being a common arrangement in coming years. Chris Miller 26/9/2000. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: urgent question to maintain the ada-language inside the enterprise 2000-09-26 20:55 ` Chris Miller @ 2000-09-26 0:00 ` nospam 2000-09-27 0:00 ` Ted Dennison 2000-09-27 0:00 ` Shayne Flint 0 siblings, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: nospam @ 2000-09-26 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <r58A5.6582$O7.121171@ozemail.com.au>, "Chris says... > >And it doesn't have to be one or the other. My current favorite platform is >a dual boot PC with (NT4/W2000) and Linux. This gives the best of both >worlds, and you only need a single box on the desk. > >You can use MS Office to do all the usual corporate stuff (Staroffice >isn't quite there yet), then hit ctrl-alt-del, and you have all the good old >Unix "pigs in mud" Makefiles, CVS, editors, shell scripts and more. I do >most Ada programming on Linux. > >I see this as being a common arrangement in coming years. Chris, my arrangment I think is even better than yours. I use Linux and have vmare running on it. I installed NT on vmware. vmware is a virtual PC. I do NOT have to reboot to use windows. I have windows right now running inside an X window along side all my other Linux applications. NOt only that, using SAMBA, I have all my windows data saved on my linux disks (easy to manage backup etc..). It is great. The speed is not as good as when running windows native, but for what I need it for, the speed is not that important (my hand is slow anyway). check it out. you can get a 30 days free trial of vmware for linux. http://www.vmware.com ps, this is not some sort of wine like thing, vmware runs ALL windows applications, any one of them. you can install not only windows on the vmware software, but any PC based OS theortically. I read that freebasd could also be run on it. check vmware site for supported OS's. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: urgent question to maintain the ada-language inside the enterprise 2000-09-26 0:00 ` nospam @ 2000-09-27 0:00 ` Ted Dennison 2000-09-27 0:00 ` David Starner ` (2 more replies) 2000-09-27 0:00 ` Shayne Flint 1 sibling, 3 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Ted Dennison @ 2000-09-27 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <8qrrdk0191a@drn.newsguy.com>, nospam@nospam wrote: > In article <r58A5.6582$O7.121171@ozemail.com.au>, "Chris says... > > > > >And it doesn't have to be one or the other. My current favorite > >platform is a dual boot PC with (NT4/W2000) and Linux. This gives the > >best of both worlds, and you only need a single box on the desk. > > > >You can use MS Office to do all the usual corporate stuff (Staroffice > >isn't quite there yet), then hit ctrl-alt-del, and you have all the > >good old Unix "pigs in mud" Makefiles, CVS, editors, shell scripts > >and more. I do most Ada programming on Linux. > my arrangment I think is even better than yours. > > I use Linux and have vmare running on it. I installed NT on vmware. > vmware is a virtual PC. I do NOT have to reboot to use windows. I You could also go the other way. I stick with Windows 2K, but have cygwin installed with it. That gives me nearly all of Unix (certianly everything Chris mentioned), while running under Windows. The only significant piece I'm missing is gprof. And I seriously doubt vmware can run Diablo II. -- T.E.D. http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: urgent question to maintain the ada-language inside the enterprise 2000-09-27 0:00 ` Ted Dennison @ 2000-09-27 0:00 ` David Starner 2000-09-28 0:00 ` Ted Dennison 2000-09-27 0:00 ` Pascal Obry 2000-09-27 0:00 ` nospam 2 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: David Starner @ 2000-09-27 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) On Wed, 27 Sep 2000 14:17:25 GMT, Ted Dennison wrote: >everything Chris mentioned), while running under Windows. The >only significant piece I'm missing is gprof. And I seriously doubt >vmware can run Diablo II. Why? It's a general CPU virtualizer running a real copy of Windows on a partially simulated chip. It should run anything that Windows can. -- David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org And crawling, on the planet's face, some insects called the human race. Lost in space, lost in time, and meaning. -- RHPS ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: urgent question to maintain the ada-language inside the enterprise 2000-09-27 0:00 ` David Starner @ 2000-09-28 0:00 ` Ted Dennison 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Ted Dennison @ 2000-09-28 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <8qt1cn$7hu1@news.cis.okstate.edu>, dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org wrote: > On Wed, 27 Sep 2000 14:17:25 GMT, Ted Dennison wrote: > >everything Chris mentioned), while running under Windows. The > >only significant piece I'm missing is gprof. And I seriously doubt > >vmware can run Diablo II. > > Why? It's a general CPU virtualizer running a real copy of Windows on > a partially simulated chip. It should run anything that Windows can. See http://www.vmware.com/products/productfaq.html#games One issue they *don't* mention is that most commercial games are written as if they are going to be the only application running on the machine. That means even if the emulation was great, you'd probably need loads more memory and CPU to get the same performance. On my Win2k machine, I had to upgrade to 256Meg of RAM to get rid of D2's disk swapping during network games when loads of enemies are on the screen (just when you *need* it to be running smoothly). The slowdowns were literally killing me. It'd probably need loads more memory and a faster CPU if it also had a second OS to deal with. -- T.E.D. (aka: Gonad the Barbarian, level 26, Normal) http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: urgent question to maintain the ada-language inside the enterprise 2000-09-27 0:00 ` Ted Dennison 2000-09-27 0:00 ` David Starner @ 2000-09-27 0:00 ` Pascal Obry 2000-10-04 0:00 ` Ted Dennison 2000-09-27 0:00 ` nospam 2 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Pascal Obry @ 2000-09-27 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> writes: > You could also go the other way. I stick with Windows 2K, but have > cygwin installed with it. That gives me nearly all of Unix (certianly > everything Chris mentioned), while running under Windows. The > only significant piece I'm missing is gprof. And I seriously doubt > vmware can run Diablo II. > gprof is included with GNAT for Windows. Pascal. -- --|------------------------------------------------------ --| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member --| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE --|------------------------------------------------------ --| http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry --| --| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination" ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: urgent question to maintain the ada-language inside the enterprise 2000-09-27 0:00 ` Pascal Obry @ 2000-10-04 0:00 ` Ted Dennison 2000-10-04 0:00 ` Ted Dennison 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Ted Dennison @ 2000-10-04 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <usnqly957.fsf@wanadoo.fr>, Pascal Obry <p.obry@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > > Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> writes: > > > everything Chris mentioned), while running under Windows. The > > only significant piece I'm missing is gprof. And I seriously doubt > > gprof is included with GNAT for Windows. Whoops. I meant "gperf" I was only off by a vowel! :-) -- T.E.D. http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: urgent question to maintain the ada-language inside the enterprise 2000-10-04 0:00 ` Ted Dennison @ 2000-10-04 0:00 ` Ted Dennison 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Ted Dennison @ 2000-10-04 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <8rg48a$ip4$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> wrote: > In article <usnqly957.fsf@wanadoo.fr>, > Pascal Obry <p.obry@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > > gprof is included with GNAT for Windows. > > Whoops. I meant "gperf" Hmmm. No I *did* mean "gprof" after all. It isn't included with Cygwin (at least not the "b20" version I have). But Pascal was quite right. It is indeed installed with the latest Win32 version of Gnat. Unfortunately it seems to blow up when I feed it a lot of data, but I can work on that. Well, hopefully that will be the stupidest thing I say today. But the day is still distressingly young... -- T.E.D. http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: urgent question to maintain the ada-language inside the enterprise 2000-09-27 0:00 ` Ted Dennison 2000-09-27 0:00 ` David Starner 2000-09-27 0:00 ` Pascal Obry @ 2000-09-27 0:00 ` nospam 2 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: nospam @ 2000-09-27 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <8qsvhd$tld$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, Ted says... >You could also go the other way. I stick with Windows 2K, but have >cygwin installed with it. That gives me nearly all of Unix (certianly >everything Chris mentioned), while running under Windows. The only problem I had with this setup, is that I could not find a good enough X server to run under windows. I tried few, but they would crash, or behave differently from X under Unix/Linux. Also Bash had some bugs under cygwin. Also, you do not all the Unix commands and tools under cygwin as you do with Linux. Overall, things did not work as well for me as using bash and X windows under Unix. But it is certinaly a possible solution for the problem of having both Unix and windows env. on same desktop. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: urgent question to maintain the ada-language inside the enterprise 2000-09-26 0:00 ` nospam 2000-09-27 0:00 ` Ted Dennison @ 2000-09-27 0:00 ` Shayne Flint 1 sibling, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Shayne Flint @ 2000-09-27 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) nospam@nospam wrote: > In article <r58A5.6582$O7.121171@ozemail.com.au>, "Chris says... > > > > >And it doesn't have to be one or the other. My current favorite platform is > >a dual boot PC with (NT4/W2000) and Linux. This gives the best of both > >worlds, and you only need a single box on the desk. > > > >You can use MS Office to do all the usual corporate stuff (Staroffice > >isn't quite there yet), then hit ctrl-alt-del, and you have all the good old > >Unix "pigs in mud" Makefiles, CVS, editors, shell scripts and more. I do > >most Ada programming on Linux. > > > >I see this as being a common arrangement in coming years. > > Chris, > > my arrangment I think is even better than yours. > > I use Linux and have vmare running on it. I installed NT on vmware. > > vmware is a virtual PC. I do NOT have to reboot to use windows. I have > windows right now running inside an X window along side all my other > Linux applications. NOt only that, using SAMBA, I have all my windows > data saved on my linux disks (easy to manage backup etc..). > > It is great. The speed is not as good as when running windows native, but > for what I need it for, the speed is not that important (my hand is slow > anyway). > > check it out. you can get a 30 days free trial of vmware for linux. > http://www.vmware.com > > ps, this is not some sort of wine like thing, vmware runs ALL windows > applications, any one of them. you can install not only windows on the > vmware software, but any PC based OS theortically. I read that freebasd > could also be run on it. check vmware site for supported OS's. Have a look at www.win4lin.com - it seems faster than vmware and is a lot cheaper. Unlike vmware, however, it will only allow you to install win 95/98. If limux is your main platform and you use windows for office apps, then Win 98 is probably OK. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Shayne Flint, MIEAust, CPEng shayne@ainslie-software.com -- Ainslie Software Pty Limited http://www.ainslie-software.com -- -- AdaJNI - Using Java APIs with Native Ada Compilers ------------------------------------------------------------------ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: urgent question to maintain the ada-language inside the enterprise 2000-09-12 18:27 urgent question to maintain the ada-language inside the enterprise DC 2000-09-13 0:00 ` bill @ 2000-09-27 0:00 ` Michael S. Simpson 2000-09-28 0:00 ` Greg Gorman 2 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Michael S. Simpson @ 2000-09-27 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1496 bytes --] Christof: Check on a product called Cool Jex. It used to be known as ObjectTeam and was an OO model of Cadre TeamWork. I think the company name was Sterling Software of Plano, Texas (USA). Mike Simpson Speaking only for myself... DC wrote: > > hello, > Can anyone help me ? > > a. We are currently working (design and analysis maintenance) with a > toolcase : TEAMWORK on unix servers(programming language : ada). > We would like to work on windowsNT instead and continue working with > ada > Does anyone currently work with the case tool TEAMWORK (cadre) for > windowsNT, or has > knowledge of persons, firms that do so ? > Could you please give us some poc ? > > b. Our second option is to change to a new case tool. > Can anyone recomment a good, solid case tool or give some references > ? > > c. The entire development (design and analysis) has been made with the > case tool teamwork. For all > packages , procedures,... we have a graphical view made with the > case tool. That allows to > maintain the application in a much clearer way. it would be most > favorable if all of that work > could be transformed toward the new case tool. > Are there case tools which allow to do such a transfer and is it > possible for the case tools you have > recommended ? > > thx in advance > Christof > > ps. Could you please reply to the following adress : > christof.denolf@army.mil.be [-- Attachment #2: Card for Michael S. Simpson --] [-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 214 bytes --] begin:vcard n:Simpson;Michael tel;pager:520-489-7933 tel;home:520-622-5039 tel;work:520-794-5381 x-mozilla-html:FALSE adr:;;;;;; version:2.1 email;internet:mssimpson@west.raytheon.com fn:Michael Simpson end:vcard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: urgent question to maintain the ada-language inside the enterprise 2000-09-12 18:27 urgent question to maintain the ada-language inside the enterprise DC 2000-09-13 0:00 ` bill 2000-09-27 0:00 ` Michael S. Simpson @ 2000-09-28 0:00 ` Greg Gorman 2 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Greg Gorman @ 2000-09-28 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) Teamwork is available on Windows/NT, contact your local Computer Associates sales office for pricing. The database files are compatible (use dump_tsa and load_tsa to move) if you are running at least Teamwork 7.1 on Unix. /Greg Gorman "DC" <christof.denolf@pandora.be> wrote in message news:Vzuv5.2264$R_2.37188@afrodite.telenet-ops.be... > hello, > Can anyone help me ? > > a. We are currently working (design and analysis maintenance) with a > toolcase : TEAMWORK on unix servers(programming language : ada). > We would like to work on windowsNT instead and continue working with > ada > Does anyone currently work with the case tool TEAMWORK (cadre) for > windowsNT, or has > knowledge of persons, firms that do so ? > Could you please give us some poc ? > > b. Our second option is to change to a new case tool. > Can anyone recomment a good, solid case tool or give some references > ? > > c. The entire development (design and analysis) has been made with the > case tool teamwork. For all > packages , procedures,... we have a graphical view made with the > case tool. That allows to > maintain the application in a much clearer way. it would be most > favorable if all of that work > could be transformed toward the new case tool. > Are there case tools which allow to do such a transfer and is it > possible for the case tools you have > recommended ? > > thx in advance > Christof > > ps. Could you please reply to the following adress : > christof.denolf@army.mil.be > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-10-04 0:00 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2000-09-12 18:27 urgent question to maintain the ada-language inside the enterprise DC 2000-09-13 0:00 ` bill 2000-09-12 0:00 ` DPH 2000-09-25 4:31 ` Robert Dewar 2000-09-25 0:00 ` peter 2000-09-26 0:00 ` DPH 2000-09-26 20:55 ` Chris Miller 2000-09-26 0:00 ` nospam 2000-09-27 0:00 ` Ted Dennison 2000-09-27 0:00 ` David Starner 2000-09-28 0:00 ` Ted Dennison 2000-09-27 0:00 ` Pascal Obry 2000-10-04 0:00 ` Ted Dennison 2000-10-04 0:00 ` Ted Dennison 2000-09-27 0:00 ` nospam 2000-09-27 0:00 ` Shayne Flint 2000-09-27 0:00 ` Michael S. Simpson 2000-09-28 0:00 ` Greg Gorman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox