From: lemchens@lemmies.lb.bawue.de (arvids lemchens)
Subject: Re: GNAT Ada.Numerics.Aux question
Date: 29 Jul 2003 07:17:00 +0200
Date: 2003-07-29T07:17:00+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8qmUYbvkACB@lemmies.lb.bawue.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ed66a020.0307281917.333e3587@posting.google.com
Hello John,
happysegfault@yahoo.com am 28.07.03 um 20:17 in comp.lang.ada:
> I'm trying out GtkAda 2.2.0 on my Red Hat 9 system using gcc 3.2.2,
Compilerrelated Problem?
> -- test_sin.adb
ich@pc3:~$ gm test_sin.adb
GNATMAKE 3.14p (20010503) Copyright 1995-2001 Free Software Foundation,
Inc.
"test_sin.ali" being checked ...
-> "test_sin.adb" time stamp mismatch
gnatgcc -c -gnatE -gnatf -gnato -gnatwa test_sin.adb
test_sin.adb:2:18: warning: "ada.numerics.aux" is an internal GNAT unit
test_sin.adb:2:18: warning: use of this unit is non-portable and
version-dependent
End of compilation
gnatbind -x test_sin.ali
gnatlink test_sin.ali
ich@pc3:~$ ./test_sin
1.41421356237309505E+00
4.99999616987255739E-01
5.00000E-01
ich@pc3:~$
Wondering if Ada.Numerics.Generic_Elementary_Functions wouldn't be a
better choice than ada.numerics.aux?
And if not, why?
MvfG,
Arvids
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-29 5:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-29 3:17 GNAT Ada.Numerics.Aux question Happy Segfault
2003-07-29 5:06 ` Anders Wirzenius
2003-07-29 5:17 ` arvids lemchens [this message]
2003-07-29 8:34 ` Preben Randhol
2003-07-29 8:37 ` Preben Randhol
2003-07-29 12:37 ` Happy Segfault
2003-07-29 12:51 ` Preben Randhol
2003-07-29 20:01 ` Gerald
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox