Problems building gnat3.13p on HP-UX

Problems building gnat3.13p on HP-UX

[Alexander Boucke]

Hello!

I encounter the following problem, whenn trying to build gnat 3.13p on HP-UX
10.20. I followed the README exactly until

make CC=gcc CFLAGS="-O2" GNATLIBFLAGS="-O2" gnatlib.

Here the following error occurs:
gmake[2]: Entering directory `/home/alexb/tmp/gnat-neu/gcc-2.8.1/ada/rts'
../../xgcc -B../../ -c -g -O2 -UIN_GCC -mdisable-indexing -O2 -I. -I/home/al
exb/tmp/gnat-neu/gcc-2.8.1/ada a-caldel.adb
a-caldel.adb:37:01: language defined units may not be recompiled

Until then everything seemend to work fine. The gcc already installed is
from gnat 3.12p.

Could anybody tell me, what is going wrong here?

Kind regards,
Alexander Boucke

Re: Problems building gnat3.13p on HP-UX

[Preben Randhol]

On Mon, 11 Sep 2000 13:25:23 +0200, Alexander Boucke wrote:
>Hello!
>
>I encounter the following problem, whenn trying to build gnat 3.13p on HP-UX
>10.20. I followed the README exactly until
>
>make CC=gcc CFLAGS="-O2" GNATLIBFLAGS="-O2" gnatlib.
         ^^^
         ? I don't have HP-UX, but on my Linux box it is called gnatgcc


>Until then everything seemend to work fine. The gcc already installed is
>from gnat 3.12p.

You cannot use both 3.12p and 3.13p

-- 
Preben Randhol - Ph.D student - http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/
"i too once thought that when proved wrong that i lost somehow"
                               - i was hoping, alanis morisette

Re: Problems building gnat3.13p on HP-UX

[Alexander Boucke]

Alright - I've forgotten to unset the environment variables needed for
gnat3.12 before building the gnatlib...

Alexander Boucke

Re: Problems building gnat3.13p on HP-UX

[Robert Dewar]

In article
<slrn8rpi13.365.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>,
>  I don't have HP-UX, but on my Linux box it is called gnatgcc

That's an oddity for some non-standard distributions of the
Linux port, it is not used on any standard releases of GNAT
>
> >Until then everything seemend to work fine. The gcc already
installed is
> >from gnat 3.12p.
>
> You cannot use both 3.12p and 3.13

This is misleading, in fact the requirement is that
3.13 be built using 3.12.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

Re: Problems building gnat3.13p on HP-UX

[Preben Randhol]

On Mon, 11 Sep 2000 22:37:42 GMT, Robert Dewar wrote:
>In article
><slrn8rpi13.365.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>,
>>  I don't have HP-UX, but on my Linux box it is called gnatgcc
>
>That's an oddity for some non-standard distributions of the
>Linux port, it is not used on any standard releases of GNAT

Hmm. Which distribution is standard? I use Debian 2.2.

>This is misleading, in fact the requirement is that
>3.13 be built using 3.12.

I misunderstood the question and I realized it only after sending the
article. I canceled thus the article, but not all news-servers follow
this request. :-(

-- 
Preben Randhol - Ph.D student - http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/
"i too once thought that when proved wrong that i lost somehow"
                               - i was hoping, alanis morisette

Re: Problems building gnat3.13p on HP-UX

[David Starner]

On 12 Sep 2000 07:48:17 GMT, Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org> wrote:
>On Mon, 11 Sep 2000 22:37:42 GMT, Robert Dewar wrote:
>>In article
>><slrn8rpi13.365.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>,
>>>  I don't have HP-UX, but on my Linux box it is called gnatgcc
>>
>>That's an oddity for some non-standard distributions of the
>>Linux port, it is not used on any standard releases of GNAT
>
>Hmm. Which distribution is standard? I use Debian 2.2.

The ACT one. Assuming the merge of GNAT with mainline gcc occurs,
Debian will probably stop making gnatgcc, but so far it's the 
easiest way to seperate 'normal' gcc 2.95 and GNAT gcc. 

-- 
David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org
http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org
And crawling, on the planet's face, some insects called the human race.
Lost in space, lost in time, and meaning.
	-- RHPS

Re: Problems building gnat3.13p on HP-UX

[Simon Wright]

Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> writes:

> In article
> <slrn8rpi13.365.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>,
> >  I don't have HP-UX, but on my Linux box it is called gnatgcc
> 
> That's an oddity for some non-standard distributions of the
> Linux port, it is not used on any standard releases of GNAT

If you only ever want to use the C compiler that comes as part of a
GNAT release, and don't want to use C++ or Fortran or ..., then the
GNAT requirement to put its bin directory on your path is fine.

The modern binary releases have a script trick to allow you to put the
binary anywhere without having to set environment variables.

However, most people will want more than that (and not just on Linux,
either).

I wrote a little package (see http://www.pogner.demon.co.uk/gnatfe/),
which uses tricks rather like those of the latest GNAT binaries, and
as supplied allows you to use GNAT versions of gcc (gnatgcc), gcov
(gnatgcov) and gdb (gnatgdb), plus the standard gnat* commands,
without individual adjustment of your path.

Re: Problems building gnat3.13p on HP-UX

[Robert Dewar]

In article
<slrn8rrnss.af.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>,
  randhol+abuse@pvv.org (Preben Randhol) wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2000 22:37:42 GMT, Robert Dewar wrote:
> >In article
> ><slrn8rpi13.365.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>,
> >>  I don't have HP-UX, but on my Linux box it is called
gnatgcc
> >
> >That's an oddity for some non-standard distributions of the
> >Linux port, it is not used on any standard releases of GNAT
>
> Hmm. Which distribution is standard? I use Debian 2.2.

I meant by standard, versions that are created by Ada Core
Technologies following the standard setup. It is indeed the
case that the Debian folks modify this, and in particular
change gcc to gnatgcc. There is nothing wrong with this, it is
just that it is special to Debian, and therefore not applicable
to other implementations.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.