From: Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: ADA Tasks
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 14:52:44 +0100
Date: 2002-12-04T14:52:44+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8p1suus2cadqohgrdq6f2bjmbo3d48jkai@4ax.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: x7vu1huu58r.fsf@smaug.pushface.org
On 03 Dec 2002 22:06:44 +0000, Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
wrote:
>Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:
>
>{re: tasks vs protected objects
>
>> But both have the same problem, they do not very support
>> refactoring. Neigther protected object nor task can be extended or
>> split, leaving the interface intact.
>
>Do you have something in mind that allows refactoring _and_
>concurrency?
No. Ada is the single language which seriously tries to express
concurrency. Others are more or less just toys. So there is nothing to
compare with.
If you ask whether it is possible to do it, then I believe it should
be possible, but a long way to go.
---
Regards,
Dmitry Kazakov
www.dmitry-kazakov.de
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-04 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-02 2:37 ADA Tasks Khuram Imtiaz
2002-12-02 4:56 ` James S. Rogers
2002-12-02 6:56 ` Richard Riehle
2002-12-02 15:15 ` Robert A Duff
2002-12-02 15:46 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2002-12-03 14:37 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2002-12-03 22:06 ` Simon Wright
2002-12-04 13:52 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox