From: Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: 'Read for pointers
Date: 2000/07/27
Date: 2000-07-27T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8lpo5p$os0$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: HVXf5.612$wE4.155736@nnrp3.sbc.net
In article <HVXf5.612$wE4.155736@nnrp3.sbc.net>,
"Pat Rogers" <progers@NOclasswideSPAM.com> wrote:
> "Ted Dennison" <dennison@telepath.com> wrote in message
> news:8lpeog$gvc$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> > Wow. That's one I would not have guessed. So there's effectively no
> > difference between "out" and "in out" for access types, composite
> types
> > with discriminants, or record types with default field values? %-}
>
> As long as the latter two happen to be passed by copy (access types
> always are).
But if they aren't passed by copy, then they have to be passed by
reference, right? In that case there would *also* be no difference.
--
T.E.D.
http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-07-27 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-07-26 0:00 'Read for pointers Ted Dennison
2000-07-26 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
2000-07-26 0:00 ` tmoran
2000-07-26 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
2000-07-27 0:00 ` tmoran
2000-07-26 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
2000-07-27 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-07-27 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
2000-07-27 0:00 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
2000-07-27 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
2000-07-26 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
2000-07-28 0:00 ` Stephen Leake
2000-07-28 0:00 ` tmoran
2000-07-29 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
2000-07-31 0:00 ` Stephen Leake
2000-07-31 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
2000-07-31 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-07-28 0:00 ` Stephen Leake
2000-07-31 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox