comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Erdmann <Michael.Erdmann@snafu.de>
Subject: Q: Refactorizing code because Inheritance and Interfaces
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 11:10:32 +0200
Date: 2003-10-18T11:10:32+02:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8lc761-u81.ln1@boavista.snafu.de> (raw)

Dear all,

again i got a problem with inheritance. Lets assume the following
situation, that you have made a nice package reading in xml
files. The specification contains something like this:

    package XML_Reader is .
       type Object is new Sax.... with ... bla...
       procedure X(This : in out Object......)

Some weeks later i have realized that this implemenation is nice, 
but it is part of a generalization:

    package Abtract_Reader is
        type Object is abstract tagged null record;
        type Handle is access all Object'Class;

        procedure X(.... ) is abstract;

In order to line up the implemenation of the XML_Reader with the 
Abstract_Reader interface i need to rewrite the complete XML_Reader.
Is there any way to avoid such situations?


Regards
    M.Erdmann


PS:
In java i would use   constructs as implements  Sax..,Abstract_Reader.





             reply	other threads:[~2003-10-18  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-18  9:10 Michael Erdmann [this message]
2003-10-20 18:57 ` Q: Refactorizing code because Inheritance and Interfaces Stephen Leake
2003-10-21 19:58   ` Michael Erdmann
2003-10-21  5:48 ` Simon Wright
2003-10-21  8:38   ` Marius Amado Alves
2003-10-21 19:50     ` Michael Erdmann
2003-10-25 12:11       ` Georg Bauhaus
2003-10-21 20:01   ` Michael Erdmann
2003-10-23 14:02     ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-21  9:00 Lionel.DRAGHI
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox