From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Tasking differences
Date: 2000/07/12
Date: 2000-07-12T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8kgk79$khp$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 396AECA4.30B03835@baesystems.com
In article <396AECA4.30B03835@baesystems.com>,
Martin Dowie <martin.dowie@baesystems.com> wrote:
> sorry, but I can't see why there should be any difference in
*results* of the
> two - if they were so different, why does GNAT produce the
same results for both
> versions? I understand that the scheduling of the 2 tasks can
change given the
> differences, but in this case I don't see why that should
affect the outcome.
Running code locked instead of unlocked makes a big difference
in the set of possible outcomes, the fact that with one
particular scheduling discipline you see no differences proves
nothing about the possible non-deterministic set of outcomes!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next parent reply other threads:[~2000-07-12 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3969B65A.46942054@baesystems.com>
[not found] ` <8ke8ao$rs3$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
[not found] ` <396AECA4.30B03835@baesystems.com>
2000-07-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2000-07-12 0:00 ` Tasking differences Martin Dowie
[not found] ` <uk8etc788.fsf@baesystems.com>
[not found] ` <8kff0n$nnu$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
2000-07-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-07-12 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-07-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-07-13 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-07-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-07-12 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-07-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox