From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Language Lawyer question
Date: 2000/06/05
Date: 2000-06-05T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8hf734$7g1$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: yec1z2fr6zs.fsf@king.cts.com
In article <yec1z2fr6zs.fsf@king.cts.com>,
Keith Thompson <kst@cts.com> wrote:
> > What is 0'Pred?
>
> If it were legal, it should be the same as 0 - 1 -- which
means the
> resolution would depend on the context.
Truly ugly! Currently, pred has nothing whatsoever to do with
the "-" operator. Creating such a linkage would be really
nasty!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-06-05 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-06-02 0:00 Language Lawyer question Wes Groleau
2000-06-02 0:00 ` Paul Graham
2000-06-02 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2000-06-02 0:00 ` Keith Thompson
2000-06-04 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
2000-06-05 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-06-05 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2000-06-05 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox