From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: package dependence question
Date: 2000/05/29
Date: 2000-05-29T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8gtvnn$g6f$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8gt19i$1cm8@r02n01.cac.psu.edu
In article <8gt19i$1cm8@r02n01.cac.psu.edu>,
Carl Banks <oaf@psu.edu> wrote:
> However, packages can't with each other, meaning that types A
> and B can't store access types to each other if they are
> defined in separate packages.
This is wrong, or at least over broad. It is fine to have
two packages A and B, where the body of each package with's
the other package and uses its declared types.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-05-29 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-05-29 0:00 package dependence question Carl Banks
2000-05-29 0:00 ` Antonio Dur�n Dom�nguez
2000-06-03 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
2000-05-29 0:00 ` Jeff Carter
2000-05-29 0:00 ` Ray Blaak
2000-05-29 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2000-05-30 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-05-30 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-05-30 0:00 ` Ray Blaak
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox