From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: LLQ: -1 a valid boolean?
Date: 2000/05/23
Date: 2000-05-23T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8gf1qh$6bk$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8geplk$10e$1@nnrp1.deja.com
In article <8geplk$10e$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> wrote:
> Ahh, that's a different kettle of fish. I thought the verdict
> was that this was a valid test, since Boolean'Size is 1, but
> that assigning it was wrong becuse Boolean_Object'Size > 1.
Boolean'Size is completely irrelevant
What is relevant is that you have an object of type Boolean
that has an abnormal value (other than 0 or 1), and any
reference to this abnormal value is erroneous.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-05-23 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-05-19 0:00 LLQ: -1 a valid boolean? Ted Dennison
2000-05-19 0:00 ` Jeff Carter
2000-05-20 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-05-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-23 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-05-23 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2000-05-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-24 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2000-05-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-24 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-05-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-23 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-23 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-05-23 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2000-05-23 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-05-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox