From: Aurele <aurele.vitali@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Status of SDLAda
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:33:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2016-09-12T16:33:00-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8f9939ae-f9f9-44d6-84c5-83c283212579@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2017734217.495413589.461127.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
> No. If you just want to write C in Ada use a thin binding.
Its not writing C in Ada when you "import" an entry from a C or stdcall library. The SDLAda body pakages makes such imports all over, hence why I said SDLAda is a "thick" binding with new or extras features. Nothing wrong with that and nothing wrong keeping SDL_ (if SDLAda it were a thin binding). Anyway, good luck, and its always good to see new Ada projects !
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-12 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-10 9:25 Status of SDLAda Michael B.
2016-09-12 1:10 ` Luke A. Guest
2016-09-12 1:12 ` Luke A. Guest
2016-09-12 19:40 ` Michael B.
2016-09-12 22:01 ` Luke A. Guest
2016-09-16 17:21 ` Michael B.
2016-09-16 20:58 ` Luke A. Guest
2016-09-12 21:39 ` Aurele
2016-09-12 22:57 ` Luke A. Guest
2016-09-12 23:33 ` Aurele [this message]
2016-09-13 1:00 ` Luke A. Guest
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox