From: don_harrison@my-deja.com
Subject: Re: access-to-constant dispatching params
Date: 2000/05/09
Date: 2000-05-09T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8f8flg$cj7$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 391722DD.1F26622B@averstar.com
Tucker Taft <stt@averstar.com> wrote:
> m_cubed@my-deja.com wrote:
> >
> > Ada provides access-to-variable dispatching
> > parameters.
[..]
> > What it doesn't seem to provide is
> > access-to-constant dispatching parameters.
>
> This is one thing being considered for Ada 0X.
>
> However, as someone else suggested, plain old "IN" parameters
> pretty much do the job and are preferable in certain ways.
In what ways do you consider in-parameters preferable?
Don Harrison
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-05-09 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-05-08 0:00 access-to-constant dispatching params m_cubed
2000-05-08 0:00 ` Andy
2000-05-09 0:00 ` don_harrison
2000-05-08 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
2000-05-09 0:00 ` don_harrison [this message]
2000-05-09 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox