From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: Hash Type Size
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2013-08-18T18:03:51-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8e573dcd-e84d-423b-b319-d2224a1ce9ae@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1679ec49-424b-43bd-8f35-a5f69e658112@googlegroups.com>
On Sunday, August 18, 2013 11:05:47 PM UTC+2, sbelm...@gmail.com wrote:
> What is the size of Ada.Containers.Hash_Type intended to be? ... Is the intent that Hash_Type should be the native size of the machine (and the implementation is wrong/advice is vague), or that it actually should be 32-bit if possible?
See AARM A.18.1(8.b/2). Looks like ist should be the native size. But it's only advice.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-19 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-18 21:05 Hash Type Size sbelmont700
2013-08-19 1:03 ` AdaMagica [this message]
2013-08-19 22:21 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-08-19 22:29 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-08-19 22:12 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-08-31 6:22 ` Peter Brooks
2013-08-31 15:57 ` sbelmont700
2013-09-03 1:47 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-09-03 2:31 ` Peter Brooks
2013-09-03 10:50 ` John B. Matthews
2013-09-03 17:18 ` Peter Brooks
2013-09-03 21:21 ` John B. Matthews
2013-09-04 4:50 ` Paul Rubin
2013-09-04 4:54 ` Paul Rubin
2013-09-05 19:30 ` John B. Matthews
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox