From: oliderid@yahoo.co.uk (Olivier Laurent)
Subject: Re: a good book to start with?
Date: 8 Oct 2003 08:44:07 -0700
Date: 2003-10-08T08:44:07-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d63e22a.0310080744.2d292add@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: DIRgb.36419$541.30979@nwrdny02.gnilink.net
"Stephane Richard" <stephane.richard@verizon.net> wrote in message news:<DIRgb.36419$541.30979@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>...
> Me well I simply prefer Ada for more than one reason. Mainly because it
> still detects more errors at compile time than Java can, which means that by
> the time yoru code compiles, there's:
> 1. a much higher change it will run
> 2. a much smaller debugging time from the coding to the end of debugging
> phase.
Well I'ven't enough experience and knowledge to follow you on that
way. But with my humble perspective...ADA is "much" easier to read
than C++ family.
Eh...I mean you just need to read it to understand what's going on.
Olivier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-08 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-07 13:10 a good book to start with? Olivier Laurent
2003-10-07 13:36 ` Stephane Richard
2003-10-08 9:29 ` Georg Bauhaus
2003-10-08 15:44 ` Olivier Laurent
2003-10-08 10:18 ` Olivier Laurent
2003-10-08 10:32 ` Stephane Richard
2003-10-08 15:44 ` Olivier Laurent [this message]
2003-10-08 16:31 ` Stephane Richard
2003-10-14 15:58 ` Colin Paul Gloster
2003-10-08 14:12 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2003-10-14 15:59 ` Colin Paul Gloster
2003-10-09 18:44 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2003-10-13 8:51 ` Olivier Laurent
2003-10-14 21:13 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox