From: Jere <jhb.chat@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Should exceeding the range of Integer wrap around a la C?
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 17:39:52 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2018-05-21T17:39:52-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d534f74-efa1-42ab-aa8a-2826b4cd6cc9@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87vabgn7rk.fsf@nightsong.com>
On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 3:11:45 PM UTC-4, Paul Rubin wrote:
> > Should exceeding the range of Integer wrap around a la C?
> SNIPPED..
>
> In C, unsigned integer overflow is undefined behaviour, like a subscript
> overflow. Wraparound is one common result because of how machine
> arithmetic works, but it is not guaranteed. The program could instead
> crash, or delete your files, or anything else. See here:
>
> http://blog.llvm.org/2011/05/what-every-c-programmer-should-know.html
Just wanted to point this out because I think you have a typo, but
overflow for unsigned integers is completely defined in the C standard.
It is considered wraparound logic [1]. Signed integer overflow is
undefined behavior however.
[1] Section 6.2.5/9 of the C11 standard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-22 0:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-21 15:23 Should exceeding the range of Integer wrap around a la C? nrs5134
2018-05-21 15:27 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2018-05-21 15:45 ` Anh Vo
2018-05-21 16:46 ` Simon Wright
2018-05-21 18:47 ` Anh Vo
2018-05-21 15:57 ` Lucretia
2018-05-21 16:49 ` Simon Wright
2018-05-21 19:11 ` Paul Rubin
2018-05-22 0:39 ` Jere [this message]
2018-05-22 0:58 ` Dan'l Miller
2018-05-22 1:36 ` Paul Rubin
2018-05-21 20:43 ` nrs5134
2018-05-22 17:52 ` Björn Lundin
2018-05-22 20:11 ` nrs5134
2018-05-22 20:23 ` Björn Lundin
2018-05-23 7:35 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox