From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: DII COE bars Ada -> Java compilation
Date: 2000/04/08
Date: 2000-04-08T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8cm9e5$9el$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 38EDE91D.C6A9EC19@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com
In article <38EDE91D.C6A9EC19@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com>,
Wes Groleau <wwgrol@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com> wrote:
> And in fact, one security report I read described a security
> hole that could be exploited by a byte-code assembler but
> which was prevented by a "correct" Java compiler.
But that is the function of the byte code verifier. Obviously
unverified code is risky no matter *what* the source. One
certainly has far more faith in the verifier than in *any*
compiler.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-04-08 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-04-05 0:00 DII COE bars Ada -> Java compilation Marc A. Criley
2000-04-05 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-04-05 0:00 ` David Starner
2000-04-05 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-04-07 0:00 ` Wes Groleau
2000-04-07 0:00 ` swhalen
2000-04-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2000-04-14 0:00 ` Wes Groleau
2000-04-05 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-05 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-06 0:00 ` Marc A. Criley
2000-04-07 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
2000-04-07 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
2000-04-07 0:00 ` Wes Groleau
2000-04-19 0:00 ` Robert Munck
2000-04-19 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
2000-04-20 0:00 ` Geoff Bull
2000-04-20 0:00 ` Hal Hawley
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox