From: "Pascal Obry" <p.obry@der.edf.fr>
Subject: Re: Why is it Called a Package?
Date: 2000/04/07
Date: 2000-04-07T07:28:29+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ck2mt$jrn$1@clnews.edf.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.BSF.4.21.0004061305320.6588-100000@shell5.ba.best.com
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1807 bytes --]
Brian Rogoff <bpr@shell5.ba.best.com> a �crit dans le message :
Pine.BSF.4.21.0004061305320.6588-100000@shell5.ba.best.com...
> I think if the syntax were to be redone I'd like the issue of "()" versus
> "[]" for array indexing to be reexamined. Then we could also think about
> some syntactic sugar for overloading "[]" as in C++. The restrictions on
> the character set that were part of the original Ada requirements don't
> make a lot of sense to me now, though the restriction to ASCII is OK.
I don't think we want that. A very nice consequence here is that you can
easily change an abstraction from:
package P is
Some_Value : array (1 .. 10) of Integer;
-- first quick implementation using basic array
end P;
to
package P is
function Some_Value (N : in Positive) return Integer;
-- real implementation using a complex structure
end P;
(or the other way around) without modifying all client code.
I really don't see what would be gained by using "[]"... a more
C/C++ syntax :)
Pascal.
--
--|------------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member |
--| |
--| EDF-DER-IPN-SID- T T I |
--| Intranet: http://cln46gb |
--| Bureau N-023 e-mail: p.obry@der.edf.fr |
--| 1 Av G�n�ral de Gaulle voice : +33-1-47.65.50.91 |
--| 92141 Clamart CEDEX fax : +33-1-47.65.50.07 |
--| FRANCE |
--|------------------------------------------------------------
--|
--| http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
--|
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-04-07 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-03-27 0:00 Why is it Called a Package? Gary Scott
2000-03-27 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-03-27 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
2000-03-27 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-03-29 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
2000-03-29 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-03-30 0:00 ` Geoff Bull
2000-03-30 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-03-30 0:00 ` Jean-Marc Bourguet
2000-03-30 0:00 ` David Starner
2000-04-03 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-04-06 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-04-07 0:00 ` Pascal Obry [this message]
2000-04-07 0:00 ` Paul Graham
2000-04-07 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
2000-04-07 0:00 ` Stanley R. Allen
2000-04-07 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-04-08 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-04-07 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
2000-04-08 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
2000-04-09 0:00 ` Stefan Skoglund
2000-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-07 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-04-07 0:00 ` Hyman Rosen
2000-04-07 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-04-12 0:00 ` Comment from the trenchs Robert Brantley
2000-04-13 0:00 ` Jeff Carter
2000-04-17 0:00 ` Robert Brantley
2000-04-07 0:00 ` Why is it Called a Package? Robert A Duff
2000-04-07 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-04-07 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-04-08 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-03-28 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-03-28 0:00 ` Jean-Marc Bourguet
2000-03-28 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-03-30 0:00 ` Alfred Hilscher
2000-03-31 0:00 ` Anders Wirzenius
2000-03-29 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
2000-03-27 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-03-27 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-03-28 0:00 ` Gary Scott
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox