Re: What is wrong here? (Generic and controlled types)

[Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>]

In article <wccn1n7mbax.fsf@world.std.com>,
  Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com> wrote:
> Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> writes:
>
> > It is interesting to argue about whether an RM reference
would
> > help. The RM reference would indeed be to the section in the
> > RM talking about rules for deriving tagged types in terms of
> > accessibility levels.
>
> If you were to put in RM references, surely you would refer
> to all the relevant paragraphs

I would mostly react "surely not", one RM reference is dubious,
a whole list of related RM references seems even less likely
to be useful.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.