From: "Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Subject: Re: Inheritance with Ada types
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 02:22:56 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2010-02-09T02:22:56-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ceb72dc-1c16-44fa-bf81-a8017e76da2e@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ir8rkh.hqm.ln@hunter.axlog.fr
On 9 fév, 10:11, Jean-Pierre Rosen <ro...@adalog.fr> wrote:
> I don't understand why people think that as soon as you have a use
> clause, you cannot use full names. If within the scope of a use clause
> you don't get what you want, or if you find that in some cases full
> names are more readable, by all mean, use full notation!
Agree with this. True that having a Use clause does not implies the
prefix notation is not available anymore.
Well, let say in this context he should not rely on the use clause to
refer to the type Parent.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-09 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-09 2:16 Inheritance with Ada types Bryan
2010-02-09 2:57 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2010-02-09 9:11 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2010-02-09 10:19 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2010-02-09 11:23 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2010-02-10 2:47 ` Randy Brukardt
2010-02-09 10:22 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne) [this message]
2010-02-09 15:08 ` Robert A Duff
2010-02-09 23:39 ` Bryan
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox