From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.not.jrcarter@acm.not.spam.org>
Subject: Re: task-safe hash table?
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 04:31:00 GMT
Date: 2006-06-02T04:31:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8aPfg.1001419$xm3.609077@attbi_s21> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <edjojeeb1lwl$.gqavpe4tqkfp.dlg@40tude.net>
Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>
> Functions on protected objects could potentially run in parallel on a
> multi-core CPU. Does anybody know if GNAT does this?
Potentially. It depends on the compiler. Last time I checked, GNAT
obtained a mutex for every operation on a protected object, including
functions.
--
Jeff Carter
"Spam! Spam! Spam! Spam! Spam! Spam! Spam! Spam!"
Monty Python's Flying Circus
53
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-02 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-29 21:42 task-safe hash table? tmoran
2006-05-29 22:56 ` John
2006-05-30 0:18 ` tmoran
2006-05-30 3:50 ` John
2006-05-30 4:35 ` tmoran
2006-05-30 9:50 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-06-01 6:32 ` Simon Wright
2006-06-01 19:30 ` tmoran
2006-06-01 20:03 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-06-01 20:07 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-06-02 4:31 ` Jeffrey R. Carter [this message]
2006-06-02 10:36 ` Stephen Leake
2006-06-03 6:50 ` tmoran
2006-06-03 20:40 ` tmoran
2006-06-02 10:35 ` Stephen Leake
2006-06-02 20:19 ` tmoran
2006-06-03 21:10 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-04 0:23 ` tmoran
2006-06-04 12:55 ` Stephen Leake
2006-06-04 17:22 ` tmoran
2006-06-08 1:10 ` Stephen Leake
2006-06-11 13:29 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-06-04 17:48 ` Simon Wright
2006-06-05 0:23 ` tmoran
2006-06-05 21:57 ` Steve Whalen
2006-06-06 11:10 ` Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
2006-05-30 15:00 ` Matthew Heaney
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox