From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Unconstrained type Unchecked_Deallocation
Date: 2000/03/08
Date: 2000-03-08T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a6f5s$5st$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 38C566CE.6283C0AD@rational.com
In article <38C566CE.6283C0AD@rational.com>,
Mark Lundquist <mark@rational.com> wrote:
> Right, hiding the instantiation of Unchecked_Deallocation is
> often a good idea.
This is stated without justification. Please give your reasons
for this, I don't see it at all.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-03-08 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-03-05 0:00 Unconstrained type Unchecked_Deallocation Andy Askey
2000-03-06 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-03-06 0:00 ` tmoran
2000-03-06 0:00 ` John English
2000-03-06 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
[not found] ` <38C566CE.6283C0AD@rational.com>
2000-03-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2000-03-08 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-04-05 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
2000-04-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-09 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
2000-04-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-12 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
2000-04-06 0:00 ` P. S. Norby
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox