From: Lucretia <lucretia9@lycos.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Compiler Bug
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 14:25:24 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2007-12-04T14:25:24-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a6283ea-be44-46d7-a2f1-a6d626266b58@p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9f4bc0eb-d44a-43f9-83bd-dd07fa8538f2@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com
On Dec 4, 9:58 pm, REH <spamj...@stny.rr.com> wrote:
> I have an issue that my compiler vendor is trying to tell me is not a
> bug. I have two functions. They both have a local variable of the
> same name. One calls the other (which is inlined). The compiler
> treats the variable in the caller as if it is of the same type as the
> one in the callee. Because of this, we get a constraint_error
> exception. The problem goes away when the pragma inline is removed.
> The vendor is trying to tell me that this behavior is acceptable and
> correct. I do not believe that it is. Please tell me who it right.
>
> REH
Which compiler? Have you tried it in GNAT?
Can you post the code?
Thanks,
Luke.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-04 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-04 21:58 Compiler Bug REH
2007-12-04 22:25 ` Lucretia [this message]
2007-12-04 22:32 ` REH
2007-12-04 22:45 ` Randy Brukardt
2007-12-04 22:45 ` Randy Brukardt
2007-12-04 22:49 ` REH
2007-12-04 22:54 ` Adam Beneschan
2007-12-05 9:46 ` Samuel Tardieu
2007-12-05 16:07 ` Adam Beneschan
2007-12-06 3:30 ` Randy Brukardt
2007-12-06 3:30 ` Randy Brukardt
2007-12-06 6:51 ` Keith Thompson
2007-12-06 16:48 ` REH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-01 11:52 Compiler bug Maciej Sobczak
2008-04-01 13:00 ` Ludovic Brenta
2008-04-01 20:43 ` Maciej Sobczak
2008-04-02 11:39 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2008-04-02 17:44 ` Per Sandberg
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox