From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Comprehending subpools
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 15:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2018-06-29T15:42:31-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a38f12f-1258-41b7-b03b-041cfce938f2@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ph62uk$188$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
On Friday, June 29, 2018 at 1:57:10 PM UTC-6, Randy Brukardt wrote:
>
> I've never seen much value for arena memory management myself, but I prefer
> to hide access types as much as possible with almost no visible surface. In
> that case, all of the memory management belongs to the objects, and that
> tends to require separate management for each object.
Hm, maybe they could be useful for some sort of distributed system? I mean if you're considering a shared memory-space (like, say, IEEE 1394) then disconnection of a device and reclaiming the address-values ala arena management seem to be fairly analogous.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-29 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-14 13:48 Comprehending subpools sbelmont700
2018-06-14 21:21 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-06-15 7:15 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2018-06-15 22:15 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-06-16 7:36 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2018-06-19 0:32 ` sbelmont700
2018-06-29 19:57 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-06-29 22:42 ` Shark8 [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox