Re: C++ virtual function mechanism in Ada ?

[Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam (Larry Kilgallen)]

In article <mRK77.407496$p33.8305450@news1.sttls1.wa.home.com>, "DuckE" <nospam_steved94@home.com> writes:
> "Larry Kilgallen" <Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam> wrote in message
> news:eO4BFW3WWD3M@eisner.encompasserve.org...
>> In article <IDz77.6315$ar1.18443@www.newsranger.com>,
> Didier.pieroux<dpieroux.no-spam@pi.be> writes:
>>
>> > As most of you know, one of the feature of C++ is the virtual function
>> > mechanism.
>>
>> I think that is a very bad assumption in an Ada newsgroup.
>>
>> Perhaps those who have been vocally comparing C++ features to Ada features
>> know C++, but that is certainly not the majority of the readership of the
>> comp.lang.ada newsgroup.
> 
> Wanna take a vote?

Absolutely not !  Somebody started a vote in another newsgroup I follow,
and it was a real waste of bandwidth.

> I think the most of the readership does know C++, but chooses Ada as a
> better choice.

What about those of us who chose Ada before there was a C++ ?