Re: windows bindings

["chris.danx" <chris.danx@ntlworld.com>]

> >compatibility.  I believe the X (MIT or OpenGroup) license is compatible
> >with the GPL but I wasn't sure how compatible it is with the GMGPL.  Has
>
> The GMGPL is just the GPL with some extra text preventing the "viral"
spread of
> the GPL under certian circumstances. If the GPL is compatable, the GMGPL
should
> be as well.

Ok.

> >anyone wrote a simplified (i.e. not in legal jargon) summary of the GMGPL
> >license that describes what it allows like the ppl have tried to do with
the
> >GPL?

> Sure. I can do it in two sentences. Its the GPL, plus:
>
> As a special exception,  if other files  instantiate  generics from this
> unit, or you link this unit with other files to produce an executable,
> this unit does not by itself cause the resulting executable to be
> covered by the GNU General Public License.  This exception does not
> however invalidate any other reasons why the executable file might be
> covered by the GNU Public License.
>
> That *is* the GMGPL. :-)

Seen it millions of times before just didn't realise this was what ppl here
meant by the GMGPL.