From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: OT-spam detection, was Re: WM, and lindens rustled
Date: 22 Jan 2004 09:47:19 -0600
Date: 2004-01-22T09:47:19-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8IZuR8u$Sd37@eisner.encompasserve.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: slrnc0vimo.a1.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@k-083152.nt.ntnu.no
In article <slrnc0vimo.a1.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@k-083152.nt.ntnu.no>, Preben Randhol <randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@pvv.org> writes:
> On 2004-01-22, Larry Kilgallen <Kilgallen@SpamCop.net> wrote:
>>
>> For improvement of the Internet, it is better to reject such connections
>> at the SMTP level, or best of all engage in teergrubing/tarpitting. Such
>> are typically done based on DNSbls of the email administrator's choice.
>
> Well, since it isn't done I would suspect this approach isn't working.
Stop over to news.admin.net-abuse.email to see all the complaints
from those whose email is rejected.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-22 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.9.1074679047.281.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
2004-01-21 18:05 ` OT-spam detection, was Re: WM, and lindens rustled tmoran
2004-01-21 19:28 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-01-22 7:56 ` Preben Randhol
2004-01-22 10:41 ` Larry Kilgallen
2004-01-22 13:06 ` Preben Randhol
2004-01-22 15:47 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox