From: Richard D Riehle <laoXhai@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: choice of fixed point type
Date: 2000/03/04
Date: 2000-03-04T19:42:19+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <89rour$jak$1@nntp3.atl.mindspring.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9vTv4.603$zz5.39941@news.pacbell.net
In article <9vTv4.603$zz5.39941@news.pacbell.net>,
tmoran@bix.com wrote:
>I asked:
>> Is <universal real> / <integer> always treated as a call on
>>function "/"(Left : Standard.Duration; Right : Integer)
>>return Standard.Duration; ?
> It turns out that was merely a problem with a single compiler.
>Three out of four compilers said the division was ambiguous.
Keeping us in suspense, Tom? Which three gave you the good information? Which
one got it wrong? Eager minds want to know. :-)
Richard Riehle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-03-04 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-03-01 0:00 choice of fixed point type tmoran
2000-03-03 0:00 ` tmoran
2000-03-04 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle [this message]
2000-03-05 0:00 ` tmoran
2000-03-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-03-06 0:00 ` David W. Glessner
2000-03-06 0:00 ` tmoran
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox