From: Oliver Kellogg <okellogg@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: homo or hetero
Date: 2000/03/01
Date: 2000-03-01T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <89j0hp$fl3$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In article <89i5vb$tqp$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote:
> [...], but what possible effect can it have on the use of the
> DSA whether you decide to call this situation homogenous or
> heterogenous?
The confusion stems from the Annex E implementation
permission that
"An implementation may require that the set of processing
nodes of a distributed system be homogeneous."
The operating system (e.g. Linux vs. Linux/RT) *should*
have no effect on the definition of "homogeneous" ?
-- Oliver
-- okellogg at freenet dot de
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next reply other threads:[~2000-03-01 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-03-01 0:00 Oliver Kellogg [this message]
2000-03-01 0:00 ` homo or hetero Robert Dewar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-02-22 0:00 Homo " Daniel Wengelin
2000-02-28 0:00 ` Oliver Kellogg
2000-02-28 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-02-29 0:00 ` Oliver Kellogg
2000-03-01 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox