From: xaplos@my-deja.com
Subject: Re: Ada 95 based RTOS
Date: 2000/02/22
Date: 2000-02-22T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <88ugrd$7j7$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 38B2A2A1.FDCDDFE7@honeywell.com
From what I can gather from the http://www.rtems.army.mil the last
version of RTEMS written in Ada was V 3.2.1. I really don't care if it's
being updated or maintained since I'm only planning to use it as a
reference. If anyone has a copy of this release or a later one, please
send it to macrod@earthlink.net - it would help me out considerably.
I'm fairly new to the Ada language and have spent a lot of time reading
how Ada is superior to C/C++ in design and safety. I'm currious if
someone can explain why there are so many RTOS based on C/C++ and "none"
(I mean easily and freely available) based on Ada. With Ada's real-time
annex and other language features, one would think an Ada-based
kernel/run-time would be superior to others.
In article <38B2A2A1.FDCDDFE7@honeywell.com>,
Matthew Majka <matthew.majka@honeywell.com> wrote:
> xaplos@my-deja.com wrote:
> >
> > Thank you very much for the reference to RTEMS. I downloaded version
4
> > only to find out that the source files are in C. I keep reading on
> > several sites that there is a version of RTEMS written in Ada;
however,
> > I can't find it.
> >
> > It is my understanding that I can compile Ada source into object
files
> > with GNAT and link them with RTEMS which is written in C to run my
> > applications on lets say an M68K. Because of the nature of the
project
> > I'm working on - master's thesis - I'd really like to be working
with
> > code from the same language - hence my desire to find the Ada
version of
> > RTEMS.
>
> I think I remember hearing that the Ada version of RTEMS is no longer
> supported/being updated. At one point you could chose from sources
> in either C or Ada, but apparently the demand for the Ada sources
> wasn't large enough to justify the effort of pr
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-02-22 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-02-18 0:00 Ada 95 based RTOS xaplos
2000-02-18 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
2000-02-21 0:00 ` xaplos
2000-02-22 0:00 ` Matthew Majka
2000-02-22 0:00 ` xaplos [this message]
2000-02-22 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-02-22 0:00 ` xaplos
2000-02-23 0:00 ` Roger Racine
2000-02-24 0:00 ` Simon Wright
2000-02-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-02-25 0:00 ` Mike Silva
2000-02-26 0:00 ` xaplos
2000-02-22 0:00 ` Stanley R. Allen
2000-02-22 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
2000-02-23 0:00 ` Tarjei T. Jensen
2000-02-23 0:00 ` Gautier
2000-02-23 0:00 ` Ehud Lamm
2000-02-23 0:00 ` Why should hackers love Ada. (Re: Ada 95 based RTOS) Marin D. Condic
2000-02-23 0:00 ` Gary
2000-02-24 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
2000-02-24 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-02-25 0:00 ` Gary Scott
2000-02-25 0:00 ` Mike Silva
2000-02-26 0:00 ` Gary Scott
2000-02-25 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
2000-02-25 0:00 ` Gary
2000-02-26 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-02-26 0:00 ` Gary Scott
2000-03-07 0:00 ` Mike Dimmick
2000-03-10 0:00 ` Wil
2000-03-10 0:00 ` Ada OS again " David Starner
2000-03-11 0:00 ` David Botton
2000-02-24 0:00 ` Gisle S�lensminde
2000-02-23 0:00 ` Vladimir Olensky
2000-02-23 0:00 ` Gautier
2000-02-24 0:00 ` Ehud Lamm
2000-02-24 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2000-02-24 0:00 ` Vladimir Olensky
2000-02-24 0:00 ` Ehud Lamm
2000-02-24 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-02-23 0:00 ` Ada 95 based RTOS Ted Dennison
2000-02-25 0:00 ` Scott Ingram
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox