comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: Win2000 has 63,000 'defects'
Date: 2000/02/17
Date: 2000-02-17T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <88h6ii$9em$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87k8k69qm9.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org

In article <87k8k69qm9.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org>,
  Florian Weimer <fw-usenet@deneb.cygnus.argh.org> wrote:
> Gautier <gautier.demontmollin@maths.unine.ch> writes:
>
> > Urging developers to clean up their code, a Microsoft exec
> > says: 'How many of you would spend $500 on a piece of
> > software with over 63,000 potential known defects?' It
> > ships Thursday.
>
> 63,000 `potential known defects' (whatever this means) isn't too bad
> for a software product consisting of over 30 million lines of code, is
> it?

Personally I agrree with that. However, ZDNet has an interesting article
disagreeing at
http://www.zdnet.com/zdhubs/stories/special2000/0,9968,2439261,00.html .
I'm not sure I agree with that author's implication that its possible to
write large sotware that is bug-free. But he goes into the economic cost
of all those bugs, and the fact that most of the bugs were in a very few
of the modules. Its one of the best unintentional bits of Ada advocacy
I've ever seen.


--
T.E.D.

http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.




  parent reply	other threads:[~2000-02-17  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-02-15  0:00 Win2000 has 63,000 'defects' Gautier
2000-02-15  0:00 ` Hyman Rosen
2000-02-15  0:00   ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-02-15  0:00     ` Hyman Rosen
2000-02-15  0:00       ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-02-15  0:00         ` Hyman Rosen
2000-02-15  0:00           ` Ed Falis
2000-02-15  0:00             ` Hyman Rosen
     [not found]             ` <RUkq4.1243$dw3.69085@news.wenet.net>
2000-02-15  0:00               ` Dang! (was Re: Win2000 has 63,000 'defects') Mike Silva
2000-02-17  0:00                 ` Preben Randhol
2000-02-17  0:00                   ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-02-15  0:00           ` Win2000 has 63,000 'defects' Brian Rogoff
     [not found]           ` <150220001931201946%emery@grebyn.com>
2000-02-17  0:00             ` Dale Pontius
     [not found]               ` <1e66z6d.1a9fzdvtbw6t2N%herwin@gmu.edu>
2000-02-19  0:00                 ` Nick Roberts
2000-02-19  0:00               ` Joe Wisniewski
2000-02-21  0:00                 ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-03-04  0:00                   ` Robert I. Eachus
2000-03-06  0:00                     ` Charles Hixson
2000-03-06  0:00                       ` Robert Dewar
2000-03-07  0:00                         ` Ted Dennison
2000-03-07  0:00                       ` Marin D. Condic
2000-03-07  0:00                         ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2000-03-08  0:00                           ` Marin D. Condic
2000-02-15  0:00       ` Brian Rogoff
2000-02-17  0:00       ` Preben Randhol
2000-02-16  0:00   ` Gautier
2000-02-17  0:00   ` Charles Hixson
2000-03-07  0:00     ` Mike Dimmick
2000-03-07  0:00       ` Brian Rogoff
2000-03-08  0:00       ` Dale Pontius
2000-03-08  0:00         ` David Starner
2000-03-08  0:00           ` Ted Dennison
2000-03-08  0:00             ` Laurent Guerby
2000-03-10  0:00             ` Tarjei T. Jensen
2000-02-15  0:00 ` Florian Weimer
2000-02-15  0:00   ` Marin D. Condic
2000-02-15  0:00   ` Larry Kilgallen
     [not found]     ` <38A9C619.790950B0@quadruscorp.com>
2000-02-15  0:00       ` Keith Thompson
2000-02-17  0:00   ` Ted Dennison [this message]
2000-02-17  0:00     ` Gautier
     [not found] ` <38A9C4ED.C75316F9@raytheon.com>
2000-02-16  0:00   ` Samuel T. Harris
2000-02-16  0:00 ` Windows TP (Re: Win2000 has 63,000 'defects') Vladimir Olensky
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox